Cited by 460Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and LeadershipLeadership and Management in Organizations

Authentic Leadership, Authentic Followership, Basic Need Satisfaction, and Work Role Performance: A Cross-Level Study

Open access
Leroy, Hannes, Anseel, Frederik, Gardner, William L., Sels, Luc·2015·Journal of Management

Abstract

Authentic leadership occurs when individuals enact their true selves in their role as a leader. This article examines the role of authentic followership in the previously established relationship between authentic leadership and follower in-role and extrarole performance behaviors. Consideration of followers who enact their true selves is important to understand how authentic leadership fosters follower self-determined work motivation and thus work role performance. Using self-determination theory (SDT) as a guiding framework, the authors propose that authentic leadership, authentic followership, and their interplay are positively related to the satisfaction of followers’ basic needs, which, in turn, are positively related to follower work role performance. The authors conducted a survey study of 30 leaders and 252 followers in 25 Belgian service companies. The results provide evidence of positive relationship for both authentic leadership and authentic followership with follower basic need satisfaction in a cross-level model where authentic leadership was aggregated to the group level of analysis. Cross-level interaction results indicated that authentic leadership strengthened the relationship between authentic followership and follower basic need satisfaction. Follower basic need satisfaction was shown to mediate the relationship of authentic leadership and authentic followership with follower work role performance. A test of mediated moderation further demonstrated that basic need satisfaction mediates the interaction of authentic leadership and authentic followership on follower work role performance. The implications for leadership research and practice are explored.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206312457822

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Authentic leaders maintain self-concordant moral freedom, thereby developing the authenticity and autonomy of followers.

    “In sum, authentic leaders maintain self-concordant moral freedom, thereby developing the authenticity and autonomy of followers (Gardner et al., 2005;Leroy, Anseel, Gardner, & Sels, 2015).”

    From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Leroy, Anseel, Gardner, & Sels, 2015

    The sections on Authentic Leadership and Basic Need Satisfaction and Authentic Functioning, Authentic Leadership, and Authentic Followership say that authentic leaders support follower autonomy and seek to promote authentic followership. They describe leaders acting in line with personal values and an internalized moral perspective, but do not establish the more specific claim that leaders maintain “self-concordant moral freedom.” Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Authentic leadership may be strongest when combined with authentic followership, such that leaders and followers share core values in a psychologically safe environment, assess situations honestly, and work together for fulfilling and productive experiences.

    “Authentic leadership may be strongest when it is combined with authentic followership, such that leaders and followers share their core values in a psychologically safe environment, assess their situations honestly and frankly, and work together to ensure fulfilling and productive experiences (Leroy et al., 2015).”

    From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Leroy et al., 2015

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Empirical studies suggest that authentic leadership positively influences followers' work attitudes and performance.

    “Empirical studies suggest that authentic leadership positively influences followers ' work attitudes and performance (e.g., Banks et al., 2016; Laschinger et al., 2013; Leroy et al., 2012).”

    From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Leroy et al., 2012

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]14. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. 2001. Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern Bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 930-942.
  2. [49]49. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. 1998-2012. Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W. L., & Sels, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2012-08-27
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
1677-1697
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2129413260
Cited by
447
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
18.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
Keywords
authentic leadership, basic need satisfaction, self-determination theory, in-role performance, true self, service companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review