The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge strategies for environmental innovations: the case of Italian manufacturing firms
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims at investigating the rather unexplored issue of how green innovators address the knowledge needs emerging when initiating a sustainability path, comparing their knowledge strategies with those of non‐green innovators. Design/methodology/approach: The authors investigate this issue using data from the 2008 Italian Community Innovation Survey (CIS). Focusing on manufacturing firms, they identify the main characteristics and knowledge assets of firms introducing environmental innovations (EIs) as opposed to those of other innovators. Findings: The authors' results suggest that the development of EIs entails a higher recourse to external knowledge, in the form of use of external sources of information, acquiring R&D from external firms and cooperation. Relationships with partners that do not belong to the supply chain – including KIBS, universities, research institutions and competitors – are far more important than for other innovations. On the contrary, differences between the two categories are less marked when it comes to investments in internal knowledge resources. Finally, proactive environmental innovators have very different knowledge strategies than reactive ones, which resemble non‐green innovators. Originality/value: The main contribution of this paper is that it investigates the unexplored issue of how firms assess and develop the knowledge needed to develop EIs. By comparing them with the strategies of non‐green innovators, the analysis performed in the paper allows understanding the peculiarities of such innovations. Furthermore, the authors contribute to the literature by verifying how knowledge management strategies vary according to the differential importance that sustainability has for the firm's innovative strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud
Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466756 · Cited by 3,947
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
Cited by
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Rehman, S. U., & Islam, T. (2020) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-11-2019-0624 · Cited by 681
Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective
Kiefer, C. P., Del Río González, P., & Carrillo‐Hermosilla, J. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2246 · Cited by 379
How Industry 4.0 technologies and open innovation can improve green innovation performance?
Mubarak, M. F., Tiwari, S., Petraite, M., Mubarik, M., & Raja Mohd Rasi, R. Z. (2021) · Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-11-2020-0266 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-07-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-582
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128433501
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge strategies for environmental innovations: the case of Italian manufacturing firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jkm-03-2013-0121
- The paper
- De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2013). Knowledge strategies for environmental innovations: the case of Italian manufacturing firms. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-03-2013-0121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.