The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation: An open innovation perspective
Abstract
Purpose: – This study aims to examine how open innovation can be effective in changing organizational inertia to create business model innovation and improve firm performance. It also seeks to explore whether the existence of open innovation has a mediating effect and influence. Design/methodology/approach: – This study constructs a theoretical model to explore the relationship between latent variables and uses a questionnaire to collect research data. In the conceptual framework, organizational inertia is a second-order latent variable and comprises three first-order latent variables: insight inertia, action inertia, and psychological inertia. Open innovation is also a second-order latent variable, and consists of two first-order latent variables: outbound and inbound open innovation. To clarify the relationship between these latent variables, structural equation modeling (SEM) is used to test the goodness of fit of the theoretical model and research hypotheses. This study uses 141 small to medium-sized manufacturing enterprises (SMEs) in Taiwan as the research subjects. Findings: – The SEM analysis revealed that open innovation has a significant mediating effect on the relationship between organizational inertia and business model innovation, and the relationship between organizational inertia and firm performance; business model innovation also has a positive influence on firm performance. Originality/value: – This study contributes the empirical analysis of SMEs to illustrate the role of open innovation on business model innovation processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.
AMABILE, T. M., CONTI, R., COON, H., LAZENBY, J., & HERRON, M. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256995 · Cited by 6,029
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200303 · Cited by 3,971
Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges
van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001 · Cited by 2,184
“IBM's global CEO report 2006: Business model innovation matters
Pohle, G., & Chapman, M. (2006) · Strategy & Leadership · doi:10.1108/10878570610701531 · Cited by 269
Value innovation in business markets: Breaking the industry recipe
Matthyssens, P., Vandenbempt, K., & Berghman, L. (2006) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.013 · Cited by 213
Organizational Learning Under Fire: Theory and Practice
CARLEY, K. M., & HARRALD, J. R. (1997) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764297040003007 · Cited by 125
Cited by
Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316675927 · Cited by 1,907
Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0
Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K.-I. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019 · Cited by 1,262
Burström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.016 · Cited by 424
Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda
Obradović, T., Vlačić, B., & Dabić, M. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102221 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, H.-C., Lai, M.-C., Lin, L.-H., & Chen, C.-T.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Change Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-10-14
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 977-1002
- ISSN
- 0953-4814 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1512605974
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 21.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation: An open innovation perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jocm-04-2012-0047
- The paper
- Huang, H.-C., Lai, M.-C., Lin, L.-H., & Chen, C.-T. (2013). Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation: An open innovation perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-04-2012-0047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.