Why are customers loyal in sharing-economy services? A relational benefits perspective
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to provide a taxonomy of relational benefits that drive customer loyalty in sharing-economy services, assess the relative strengths of these relational benefits in influencing customer loyalty and examine whether commitment mediates the influence of relational benefits on customer loyalty in this context. Design/methodology/approach: Relational benefits of sharing-economy services were explored through a focus group interview, followed by an online survey completed by 440 respondents in China. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypotheses. Findings: This study shows that confidence and social benefits have significant and positive effects on commitment in sharing-economy services. In addition, safety benefits, a new type of relational benefits, also significantly affect commitment in this context. Furthermore, the findings suggest that commitment acts as a mediator between confidence, social and safety benefits and customer loyalty. Special treatment benefits had no effect on commitment and loyalty in the sharing-economy context. Practical implications: This paper provides sharing-economy service providers with insight on how to better create and sustain loyal relationships with customers through the provision of relational benefits. Originality/value: This study offers initial insight into why customers would stay in peer-to-peer relationships in the sharing economy, and suggests how to strengthen relationships between customers and peer service providers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Customers form post-consumption attitudes toward the platform, including brand loyalty.
“That is, customers form post-consumption attitudes toward the platform (Mao and Lyu, 2017;So et al., 2018), including platform brand perceptions and brand personality (Lee and Kim, 2018), brand loyalty (Lalicic and Weismayer, 2017;Mody and Hanks, 2019;Yang et al., 2017) and willingness to pay a price premium (Zhang et al., 2019).”
From Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy (2019) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2017
Customers tend to develop commitment to a platform rather than service providers.
“Furthermore, customers tend to develop commitment to a platform (e.g.Airbnb) rather than service providers (e.g. a host; Lalicic and Weismayer, 2017;Mody and Hanks, 2019;Yang et al., 2017).”
From Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy (2019) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2017
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139 · see citing works
Chen, P.-T., & Hu, H.-H. (2010) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.09.006 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy
Wirtz, J., So, K. K. F., Mody, M. A., Liu, S. Q., & Chun, H. H. (2019) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-11-2018-0369 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability
Curtis, S. K., & Lehner, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030567 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Why continue sharing: Determinants of behavior in ridesharing services
Arteaga-Sánchez, R., Belda-Ruiz, M., Ros-Galvez, A., & Rosa-Garcia, A. (2020) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/1470785318805300 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Liang, T.-P., Lin, Y.-L., & Hou, H.-C. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103471 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, S., Song, Y., Chen, S., & Xia, X.
- Affiliations
- Donghua University (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Hunan University (CN)
- Venue
- Journal of Services Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-02-13
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-62
- ISSN
- 0887-6045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121473825
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 33.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Services Marketing (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Keywords
- customer loyalty, sharing economy, relationship benefits, customer commitment, peer-to-peer services, confidence, social benefits, safety benefits, special treatment benefits, customer relationship management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review