The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extending the context of service: from encounters to ecosystems
Abstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to extend conceptually the context of service beyond service encounters and servicescapes by applying a service-ecosystem approach to context and experiential view on value. Design/methodology/approach: – We develop a conceptual framework of an extended service context that is based on an S-D logic, service-ecosystems view. Findings: – The service ecosystem approach proposed here contributes to the advancement of “services” marketing research by extending the context of service in two ways: its emphasis on service as the basis of all exchange allows the consideration of all instances of value-in-use, in-context, to be considered as a service experience; its conceptualization of context broadens the time/place dimensions that conventionally restrain research in service encounters and servicescapes beyond physical, social, symbolic and relational dimensions to consider the multiplicity of institutions across a wider socio-historic space. Research limitations/implications: – This paper offers a broad conceptual framework for considering an extended view of service context. Future research is needed, both conceptual and empirical, to identify more specific components of service context and how they influence evaluations of experience. Practical implications: – Extending the scope of service context draws attention to the participation of customers and other actors in the co-creation of the service context, as well as the experience. This points toward the need to consider the competences and skills of customers as well as their socio-historic perspective in the design and development of a servicescape or more specific service encounter. Originality/value: – We offer a dynamic perspective of service context to help further the reach of services marketing research by extending the context of service across a variety of exchange encounters and pointing toward institutions as a central influence on phenomenological views of experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Self-citationService-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Self-citationServicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees
Bitner, M. J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252042 · Cited by 7,271
The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252174 · Cited by 4,860
A Role Theory Perspective on Dyadic Interactions: The Service Encounter
Solomon, M. R., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. A., & Gutman, E. G. (1985) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251180 · Cited by 2,004 · cited 1×
“As interest in service encounters grew, studies began to explore the roles (of firms and customers) in direct interactions, as well as the expectations of exchange associated with those roles (e.g. Arnould and Price, 1993; Solomon et al., 1985).”
BackgroundContextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange
Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593110393713 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationAn expanded servicescape perspective
Rosenbaum, M. S., & Massiah, C. (2011) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/09564231111155088 · Cited by 601
Chandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670514537709 · Cited by 549
Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139043120 · Cited by 335
Self-citationThe servicescape: The social dimensions of place
Johnstone, M.-L. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2012.694370 · Cited by 91
Cited by
Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research
Becker, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00718-x · Cited by 944
The Multilevel Nature of Customer Experience Research: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda
Kranzbühler, A., Kleijnen, M. H. P., Morgan, R. E., & Teerling, M. (2018) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12140 · Cited by 389
Viewpoint: The impact of coronavirus on service ecosystems as service mega-disruptions
Kabadayi, S., O’Connor, G. E., & Tuzovic, S. (2020) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-03-2020-0090 · Cited by 147
Twenty-seven years of service research: a literature review and research agenda
Furrer, O., Yu Kerguignas, J., Delcourt, C., & Gremler, D. D. (2020) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-02-2019-0078 · Cited by 101
Wellness tourism: customer-perceived value on customer engagement
Xie, L., Guan, X., He, Y., & Huan, T.-C. (2022) · Tourism Review · doi:10.1108/tr-06-2020-0281 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Akaka, M. A., & Vargo, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Services Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-09-14
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6/7
- Pages
- 453-462
- ISSN
- 0887-6045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123350241
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 56.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending the context of service: from encounters to ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jsm-03-2015-0126
- The paper
- Akaka, M. A., & Vargo, S. L. (2015). Extending the context of service: from encounters to ecosystems. Journal of Services Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-03-2015-0126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.