The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customer journeys: a systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Customer journeys have become an increasingly important topic in service management and design. The purpose of this paper is to review customer journey terminology and approaches within the research literature prior to 2013, mainly from the fields of design, management, and marketing. Design/methodology/approach: The study was conducted as a systematic literature review. Searches in Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, ACM Digital Library, and ScienceDirect identified 45 papers for the analysis. The papers were analyzed with respect to customer journey terminology and approaches, the relation to customer experience, the referenced background, and the use of visualizations. Findings: Across the reviewed literature, customer journeys are described not only as a means to take the viewpoint of the customer, but also to reach insight into their experiences. A rich and at times incoherent customer journey terminology is analyzed and discussed, as are two emerging customer journey approaches: customer journey mapping (analysis of a service process “as is”) and customer journey proposition (generative activities leading toward a possible service “to be”). Research limitations/implications: The review is limited to analyzing and making claims on research papers that explicitly apply the term customer journey. In most of the reviewed papers, customer journeys are not the main object of interest but are discussed as one of several topics. Practical implications: A nuanced discussion of customer journey terminology and approaches is provided, supporting the practical application of a customer journey perspective. Originality/value: The review contributes a needed common basis for future customer journey research and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0420 · Cited by 5,765
Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies
Verhoef, P. C., Lemon, K. N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.001 · Cited by 3,140
Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context
Ostrom, A. L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D. E., Patrício, L., & Voss, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670515576315 · Cited by 1,469
Service design for experience-centric services
Zomerdijk, L. G., & Voss, C. A. (2010) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670509351960 · Cited by 960
Service portraits in service research: a critical review
Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A., & Roos, I. (2005) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564230510587177 · Cited by 763
Cited by
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542 · Cited by 2,753
Bonfanti, A., Vigolo, V., Vannucci, V., & Brunetti, F. (2023) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/ijrdm-12-2021-0588 · Cited by 84
Bearnot, B., & Mitton, J. A. (2020) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000648 · Cited by 33
S, S. (2024) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103616 · Cited by 23
Poorrezaei, M., Pich, C., & Resnick, S. (2023) · Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-07-2022-0120 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Følstad, A., & Kvale, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Service Theory and Practice
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-02-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 196-227
- ISSN
- 2055-6225 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2785473924
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.