The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer
Abstract
Purpose: Over the past decade, the term prosumption (denoting simultaneous consumption and production) has exhibited a dramatic increase in frequency of use in publications in the social sciences and business studies. This paper aims to explore the current state of research into prosumption, particularly related to marketing. Design/methodology/approach: This study systematically reviews papers on prosumption extracted from the Web of Science, using two bibliometric analyses on 20 years of data: citation counts from HistCite and bibliographic coupling and cartography analysis from the visualization of similarities software VOSviewer. A total of 75 papers on prosumption were found from the period 1997-2017, and the most influential authors, articles, journals, institutions and countries among these were determined. Furthermore, bibliographic coupling and most co-occurrent keywords in the title, keywords and abstracts were found. Findings: This study found that the USA and the UK were the most influential among prosumption publications. Ritzer was the most prominent author and Journal of Consumer Culture was the top-ranking journal. Three clusters were found using bibliographic coupling and cartography analysis: prosumer and co-creation, prosumer and user-generated content and prosumer and informational capital. Research limitations/implications: This analysis provided a basis for conceptualizing publications on prosumption related to business and sociology in the discipline of marketing. Content analysis found that prosumption research in marketing is in early stages: little quantitative study has been conducted yet. Researchers have not yet constructed a quantitative measure for prosumption. Practical implications: Business firms can engage prosumers to gain market share and competitive advantage, especially relative to value co-creation, with near-zero marginal cost. Originality/value: This may be the first bibliometric analysis and systematic review of prosumption research in marketing studies. The achievements of this paper open new avenues for other prosumption researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114562629 · Cited by 7,495
Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20015 · Cited by 6,487
Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis
Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029 · Cited by 3,221
Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’
Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540509354673 · Cited by 2,075
Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006 · Cited by 1,416
Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(00)00051-0 · Cited by 882
Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review
Nederhof, A. J. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2 · Cited by 786
Working consumers: the next step in marketing theory?
Cova, B., & Dalli, D. (2009) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593109338144 · Cited by 746
Trying to prosume: toward a theory of consumers as co-creators of value
Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., & Troye, S. V. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0060-2 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D., & Hussain, S. T.
- Venue
- Kybernetes
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-08-05
- Volume
- ahead-of-print
- Issue
- ahead-of-print
- ISSN
- 0368-492X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2969248106
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 34.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/k-12-2018-0696
- The paper
- Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D., & Hussain, S. T. (2019). Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-12-2018-0696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.