The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Instafamous and social media influencer marketing
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to test the effects of two types of celebrities (Instagram celebrity vs traditional celebrity) on source trustworthiness, brand attitude, envy and social presence. The proposed theoretical model consists of the celebrity type as the independent variable, social presence as the mediator and self-discrepancy as the moderator. Design/methodology/approach: A randomized two-group comparison (Instagram celebrity vs traditional celebrity) between-subjects experiment (n=104) was conducted. Findings: The results indicate that consumers exposed to Instagram celebrity’s brand posts perceive the source to be more trustworthy, show more positive attitude toward the endorsed brand, feel stronger social presence and feel more envious of the source than those consumers exposed to traditional celebrity’s brand posts. Structural equation modeling (Mplus 8.0) and bootstrap confidence intervals indicate that social presence mediates the causal effects of celebrity type on trustworthiness, brand attitude and envy. Multiple regression analyses reveal the moderating effects of appearance-related actual–ideal self-discrepancy. Practical implications: Ultimately, managerial implications for social media marketing and Instagram influencer-based branding are provided. From the perspective of marketing planning, the findings speak to the power of influencer marketing as an effective branding strategy. Originality/value: The paper discusses theoretical implications for the marketing literature on celebrity endorsements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Ohanian, R. (1990) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191 · Cited by 4,043
McCracken, G. (1986) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209048 · Cited by 2,843
De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035 · Cited by 2,548
Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164 · Cited by 1,812
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009 · Cited by 1,756
Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self.
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.73.1.91 · Cited by 1,585
Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of Social Media Influencers
Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2017) · Celebrity Studies · doi:10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292 · Cited by 1,505
Human Brands: Investigating Antecedents to Consumers’ Strong Attachments to Celebrities
Thomson, M. (2006) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.3.104 · Cited by 1,142
YouTube vloggers' influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions
Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171 · Cited by 1,027
Cited by
Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024 · Cited by 804
Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2019.1708781 · Cited by 671
‘Instagram made Me buy it’: Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry
Djafarova, E., & Bowes, T. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102345 · Cited by 650
When less is more: the impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure
Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2020.1718740 · Cited by 508
Tafesse, W., & Wood, B. P. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102303 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E.
- Venue
- Marketing Intelligence & Planning
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-03-21
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 567-579
- ISSN
- 0263-4503 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2923877615
- Cited by
- 1,020
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 150.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/mip-09-2018-0375
- The paper
- Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-09-2018-0375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.