Cited by 104Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPolicing Practices and PerceptionsStress and Burnout Research

Law enforcement suicide: a review

Violanti, John M., Owens, Sherry L., McCanlies, Erin, Fekedulegn, Desta, Andrew, Michael E.·2019·Policing An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of law enforcement suicide research from 1997 to 2016. Design/methodology/approach The PRISMA systematic review methodology was implemented. A SCOPUS search identified a total of 97 documents. After applying all exclusion criteria, the results included a list of 44 articles in the review. Findings Overall, studies investigating law enforcement suicide rates show conflicting results, with some studies showing lower suicide rates among law enforcement, some showing higher rates, and some showing no difference to comparison populations. Recurring research themes were lack of an appropriate comparison group, and small statistical power, particularly for minority and female officers. Stressors related to suicide among police included lack of organizational support, traumatic events, shift work, stigma associated with asking for help, or problems associated with fitting in with the police culture. Problems associated with domestic relationships and alcohol use were commonly mentioned as precursors to suicide or as correlates of suicidal ideation and were hypothesized to arise from stressful working conditions. Research limitations/implications Some limitations in law enforcement suicide research include the lack of theory, under-reporting of suicides, and guarded survey responses from police officers. Future directions in police suicide research include investigating etiological factors such as past adverse life and family experiences, social-ecological variation in suicide, or differences in suicide rates within the law enforcement occupation. Practical implications Police work, given chronic and traumatic stress, lack of support, danger, and close public scrutiny is a fertile occupation for increased suicide risk. Awareness of the scope of the problem and associated risk factors can help to initiate prevention programs. Originality/value This paper provides a long-term review of literature regarding police suicidality, with suggestions for research and prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/pijpsm-05-2017-0061

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Violanti, J. M., Owens, S. L., McCanlies, E., Fekedulegn, D., & Andrew, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Policing An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-04-08
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
141-164
ISSN
1363-951X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801173806
Cited by
104
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Policing An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
police suicide, suicidal ideation, suicide risk factors, occupational stress, organizational support, help-seeking stigma, police culture, domestic relations, alcohol consumption, suicide prevention, women officers, shift work, traumatic events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review