The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to identify, analyse and organise the literature about blockchains in supply chain management (SCM) context (blockchain–SCM integration) and proposes an agenda for future research. This study aims to shed light on what the main current blockchain applications in SCM are, what the main disruptions and challenges are in SCM because of blockchain adoption and what the future of blockchains holds in SCM. Design/methodology/approach: This study followed the systematic review approach to analyse and synthesise the extant literature on blockchain–SCM integration. The review analysed 27 papers between 2008 and 2018 in peer-reviewed journals. Findings: Blockchain–SCM integration is still in its infancy. Scholars and practitioners are not fully aware of the potential of blockchain technology to disrupt traditional business models. However, the electric power industry seems to have a relatively mature understanding of blockchain–SCM integration, demonstrated by the use of smart contracts. Additionally, the disintermediation provided by blockchain applications has the potential to disrupt traditional industries (e.g. health care, transportation and retail). Research limitations/implications: The limitations of this study are represented mainly by the scarcity of studies on blockchain–SCM integration in leading journals and databases. Practical implications: This study highlights examples of blockchain–SCM integration, emphasising the need to rethink business models to incorporate blockchain technology. Originality/value: This study is the first attempt to synthesise existing publications about the blockchain–SCM integration, shedding light on the disruption caused by, and the necessity of, the SCM reconfigurations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2566339 · Cited by 4,552
1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
Kshetri, N. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 · Cited by 2,149
Schanes, K., Dobernig, K., & Gözet, B. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030 · Cited by 1,365
Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., & Jiang, W. (2016) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0574-6 · Cited by 1,240
Can blockchain strengthen the internet of things?
Kshetri, N. (2017) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2017.3051335 · Cited by 918
BlockChain: A Distributed Solution to Automotive Security and Privacy
Dorri, A., Steger, M., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2017) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1700879 · Cited by 807
Risius, M., & Spohrer, K. (2017) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-017-0506-0 · Cited by 803
Adaptable Blockchain-Based Systems: A Case Study for Product Traceability
Lu, Q., & Xu, X. (2017) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2017.4121227 · Cited by 483
Kembro, J., Selviaridis, K., & Näslund, D. (2014) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-12-2013-0460 · Cited by 168
Analysing supply chain integration through a systematic literature review: a normative perspective
Mustafa Kamal, M., & Irani, Z. (2014) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-12-2013-0491 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Dutta, P., Choi, T.-M., Somani, S., & Butala, R. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067 · Cited by 1,545
Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture
Lezoche, M., Hernandez, J. E., Alemany Díaz, M. D. M. E., Panetto, H., & Kacprzyk, J. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103187 · Cited by 835
Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, M. M. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102064 · Cited by 470
Self-citationBlockchain and sustainable supply chain management in developing countries
Kshetri, N. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102376 · Cited by 344
Blockchain-based life cycle assessment: An implementation framework and system architecture
Zhang, A., Zhong, R. Y., Farooque, M., Kang, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104512 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Queiroz, M. M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. H.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-08-22
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-254
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914938116
- Cited by
- 962
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 17.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm-03-2018-0143
- The paper
- Queiroz, M. M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. H. (2019). Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-03-2018-0143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.