Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Young adults’ perspectives on their psychosocial outcomes 16 years following childhood traumatic brain injury

Rosema, S., Muscara, F., Anderson, V., Godfrey, C., Eren, S., Catroppa, C.·2014·Social Care and Neurodisability
DOI 10.1108/scn-06-2013-0022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: – Childhood traumatic brain injury (CTBI) is one of the most common causes of mortality and disability in children and adolescents that impacts on neuropsychological, social and psychological development. A disruption of development in these areas often results in long-term problems with interpersonal relationships, participation in leisure and social activities and employment status. These social and psychological problems appear to persist longer in comparison to other functional consequences, although evidence is scarce. The purpose of this paper is to investigate social and psychological outcomes 15 years post-injury. Design/methodology/approach: – In all, 36 participants post-CTBI (mean age 21.47 years, SD=2.74), 16 males) and 18 healthy controls (mean age 20.94 years, SD=2.21), 12 males) were recruited from a larger sample of a longitudinal study conducted at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Information about social and psychological functioning was collected via questionnaires completed at 15 years post-injury. Findings: – Results showed that post-CTBI, adolescents and young adults reported elevated risk of developing psychological problems following their transition into adulthood. CTBI survivors reported greatest problems on internalizing symptoms such as depression, anxiety and withdrawal. Social implications: – Despite the reported psychological symptoms, the survivors of CTBI did not report more social problems than their peers. Further research is needed to identify long-term social and psychological problems so that optimal intervention may be provided. Originality/value: – This is the first perspective longitudinal study investigating the young adults perspective of their long-term psychosocial outcomes following CTBI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/scn-06-2013-0022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Anderson, V. and Beauchamp, M. (2012), “SOCIAL: a theoretical model of developmental social neuroscience”, in Anderson, V. and Beauchamp, M.H. (Eds), Developmental Social Neuroscience and Childhood Brain Insult: Theory and Practice, The Guilford Press, New York, NY and London, pp. 3-20.
  2. Anderson, V. and Catroppa, C. (2005), “Recovery of executive skills following paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI): a 2 year follow-up”, Brain Injury, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 459-70. · DOI
  3. Anderson, V. , Brown, S. and Newitt, H. (2010), “What contributes to quality of life in adult survivors of childhood traumatic brain injury?”, J Neurotrauma, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 863-70. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Andrews, T.K. , Rose, F.D. and Johnson, D.A. (1998), “Social and behavioural effects of traumatic brain injury in children”, Brain Injury, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 133-8. · DOI
  5. Asarnow, R.F. , Satz, P. , Light, R. , Lewis, R. and Neumann, E. (1991), “Behavior problems and adaptive functioning in children with mild and severe closed head injury”, J. Pediatr. Psychol, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 543-55. · DOI
  6. Beauchamp, M.H. and Anderson, V. (2010), “Social: an integrative framework for the development of social skills”, Psychol Bull, Vol. 136 No. 1, pp. 39-64. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Berry, J.G. , Jamieson, L.M. and Harrison, J.E. (2010), “Head and traumatic brain injuries among Australian children, July 2000-June 2006”, Injury Prevention, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 198-202. · DOI
  8. Catroppa, C. , Godfrey, C. , Rosenfield, J. , Hearps, S. and Anderson, V. (2012), “Functional recovery ten years after pediatric traumatic brain injury: outcomes and predictors”, Journal of Neurotrauma, Vol. 29 No. 16, pp. 2539-47. · DOI
  9. Cattelani, R. , Lombardi, F. , Brianti, R. and Mazzucchi, A. (1998), “Traumatic brain injury in childhood: intellectual, behavioural and social outcome into adulthood”, Brain Inj, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 283-96. · DOI
  10. Didus, E. , Anderson, V. and Catroppa, C. (1999), “The development of pragmatic communication skills in head injured children”, Pediatric Rehabilitation, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 177-86. · doi:10.1080/136384999289441
  11. Fabbri, A. , Servadei, F. , Marchesini, G. , Negro, A. and Vandelli, A. (2010), “The changing face of mild head injury: temporal trends and patterns in adolescents and adults from 1997 to 2008”, Injury, Vol. 41 No. 7, pp. 968-72. · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.002
  12. Fletcher, J.M. , Ewing-Cobbs, L. , Miner, M.E. , Levin, H.S. and Eisenberg, H.M. (1990), “Behavioral changes after closed head injury in children”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 93-8. · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.58.1.93 · Paper page
  13. Ganesalingam, K. , Yeates, K.O. , Taylor, H.G. , Walz, N.C. , Stancin, T. and Wade, S. (2011), “Executive functions and social competence in young children 6 months following traumatic brain injury”, Neuropsychology, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 466-76. · DOI
  14. Hanten, G. , Wilde, E.A. , Menefee, D.S. , Li, X. , Lane, S. , Vasquez, C. , Chu, Z. , Ramos, M.A. , Yallampalli, R. , Swank, P. , Chapman, S.B. , Gamino, J. , Hunter, J.V. and Levin, H.S. (2008), “Correlates of social problem solving during the first year after traumatic brain injury in children”, Neuropsychology, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 357-70. · DOI
  15. Janusz, J.A. , Kirkwood, M.W. , Yeates, K.O. and Taylor, H.G. (2002), “Social problem-solving skills in children with traumatic brain injury: long-term outcomes and prediction of social competence”, Child Neuropsychology, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 179-94. · DOI
  16. Karver, C. , Wade, S. , Cassedy, A. , Taylor, G. and Stancin, T. (2012), “Age at injury and long-term behavior problems after traumatic brain injury in young children”, Rehabil Psychol, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 256-65. · DOI
  17. Kaufman, J. , Birmaher, B. , Brent, D. , Rao, U. and Ryan, N. (1997), “Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children: present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data”, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 36 No. 7, pp. 980-8. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Leadbeater, B. , Kuperminc, G. , Blatt, S. and Hertzog, C. (1999), “A multivariate model of gender differences in adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems”, Dev Psychol, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 1268-82. · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1268 · Paper page
  19. Levin, H.S. , Hanten, G. and Li, X. (2009), “The relation of cognitive control to social outcome after paediatric TBI: implications for intervention”, Developmental Neurorehabilitation, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 320-9. · DOI
  20. Max, J.E. , Koele, S.L. , Lindgren, S.D. , Robin, D.A. , Smith, W.L. Jr , Sato, Y. and Arndt, S. (1998a), “Adaptive functioning following traumatic brain injury and orthopedic injury: a controlled study”, Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vol. 79 No. 8, pp. 893-9. · DOI
  21. Max, J.E. , Lindgren, S.D. , Robin, D.A. , Smith, W.L. Jr , Sato, Y. , Mattheis, P.J. , Castillo, C.S. and Stierwalt, J.A. (1997a), “Traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents: psychiatric disorders in the second three months”, J Nerv Ment Dis, Vol. 185 No. 6, pp. 394-401. · DOI
  22. Max, J.E. , Robin, D.A. , Lindgren, S.D. , Smith, W.L. Jr , Sato, Y. , Mattheis, P.J. , Stierwalt, J.A. and Castillo, C.S. (1997b), “Traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents: psychiatric disorders at two years”, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, Vol. 36 No. 9, pp. 1278-85. · DOI
  23. Max, J.E. , Arndt, S. , Castillo, C.S. , Bokura, H. , Robin, D.A. , Lindgren, S.A. and Mattheis, P.J. (1998b), “Attention-deficit hyperactivity symptomatology after traumatic brain injury: a prospective study”, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 37 No. 8, pp. 841-7. · DOI
  24. Max, J.E. , Castillo, C.S. , Bokura, H. , Robin, D.A. , Lindgren, S.D. , Smith, W.L. Jr , Sato, Y. and Mattheis, P.J. (1998c), “Oppositional defiant disorder symptomatology after traumatic brain injury: a prospective study”, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 186 No. 6, pp. 325-32. · DOI
  25. Max, J.E. , Robin, D.A. , Lindgren, S.D. , Smith, W.L. Jr , Sato, Y. , Mattheis, P.J. and Castillo, C.S. (1998d), “Traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents: psychiatric disorders at one year”, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 290-7. · DOI
  26. Max, J.E. , Wilde, E. , Bigler, E. , Maclead, M. , Vasquez, A. , Schmidt, A. , Chapman, S.B. , Hotz, G. , Yang, T.T. and Levin, H. (2012), “Psychiatric disorders after pediatric traumatic brain injury: a perspective, longitudinal, controlled study”, Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 427-36. · DOI
  27. Muscara, F. , Catroppa, C. and Anderson, V. (2008), “Social problem-solving skills as a mediator between executive function and long-term social outcome following paediatric traumatic brain injury”, Journal of Neuropsychology, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 445-61. · DOI
  28. Rosema, S. , Crowe, L. and Anderson, V. (2012), “Social function in children and adolescents after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review 1989-2011”, Journal of Neurotrauma, Vol. 29 No. 7, pp. 1277-91. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rutherford, R.B. , Quinn, M.M. and Mathur, S.R. (Eds) (2004), Handbook of Research in Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
  30. Teasdale, G. and Jennett, B. (1974), “Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness”, Lancet, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 81-84. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Tonks, J. , Williams, W.H. , Frampton, I. , Yates, P. and Slater, A. (2007), “Reading emotions after child brain injury: a comparison between children with brain injury and non-injured controls”, Brain Injury, Vol. 21 No. 7, pp. 731-9. · DOI
  32. van Tol, E. , Gorter, J. , DeMatteo, C. and Meester-Delver, A. (2011), “Participation outcomes for children with acquired brain injury: a narrative review”, Brain Inj, Vol. 25 Nos 13-14, pp. 1279-87.
  33. Warschausky, S. , Cohen, E.H. , Parker, J.G. , Levendosky, A.A. and Okun, A. (1997), “Social problem-solving skills of children with traumatic brain injury”, Pediatric Rehabilitation, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 77-81. · DOI
  34. Yeates, K.O. , Taylor, H.G. , Walz, N.C. , Stancin, T. and Wade, S.L. (2010), “The family environment as a moderator of psychosocial outcomes following traumatic brain injury in young children”, Neuropsychology, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 345-56. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rosema, S., Muscara, F., Anderson, V., Godfrey, C., Eren, S., & Catroppa, C.
Venue
Social Care and Neurodisability
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-08-05
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
135-144
ISSN
2042-0919
DOI
10.1108/scn-06-2013-0022
Cited by
16
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.