The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of 6H-SiC, 3C-SiC, and Si for power devices
Abstract
The drift region properties of 6H- and 3C-SiC-based Schottky rectifiers and power MOSFETs that result in breakdown voltages from 50 to 5000 V are defined. Using these values, the output characteristics of the devices are calculated and compared with those of Si devices. It is found that due to very low drift region resistance, 5000-V SiC Schottky rectifiers and power MOSFETs can deliver on-state current density of 100 A/cm/sup 2/ at room temperature with a forward drop of only 3.85 and 2.95 V, respectively. Both devices are expected to have excellent switching characteristics and ruggedness due to the absence of minority-carrier injection. A thermal analysis shows that 5000-V, 6H-, and 3C-SiC MOSFETs and Schottky rectifiers would be approximately 20 and 18 times smaller than corresponding Si devices, and that operation at higher temperatures and at higher breakdown voltages than conventional Si devices is possible. Also, a significant reduction in the die size is expected.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Material Science and Device Physics in SiC Technology for High-Voltage Power Devices
Kimoto, T. (2015) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.7567/jjap.54.040103 · Cited by 1,176
Die Attach Materials for High Temperature Applications: A Review
Manikam, V. R., & Cheong, K. Y. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1109/tcpmt.2010.2100432 · Cited by 478
Power Cycling Reliability of Power Module: A Survey
Durand, C., Klingler, M., Coutellier, D., & Naceur, H. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability · doi:10.1109/tdmr.2016.2516044 · Cited by 239
Bulk and epitaxial growth of silicon carbide
Kimoto, T. (2016) · Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials · doi:10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2016.04.018 · Cited by 222
Parallel Connection of Silicon Carbide MOSFETs—Challenges, Mechanism, and Solutions
Li, H., Zhao, S., Wang, X., Ding, L., & Mantooth, H. A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2023.3278270 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhatnagar, M., & Baliga, B. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 645-655
- ISSN
- 0018-9383 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160286674
- Cited by
- 1,120
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of 6H-SiC, 3C-SiC, and Si for power devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/16.199372
- The paper
- Bhatnagar, M., & Baliga, B. J. (1993). Comparison of 6H-SiC, 3C-SiC, and Si for power devices. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. https://doi.org/10.1109/16.199372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.