The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy
Abstract
This paper presents diffeomorphic transformations of three-dimensional (3-D) anatomical image data of the macaque occipital lobe and whole brain cryosection imagery and of deep brain structures in human brains as imaged via magnetic resonance imagery. These transformations are generated in a hierarchical manner, accommodating both global and local anatomical detail. The initial low-dimensional registration is accomplished by constraining the transformation to be in a low-dimensional basis. The basis is defined by the Green's function of the elasticity operator placed at predefined locations in the anatomy and the eigenfunctions of the elasticity operator. The high-dimensional large deformations are vector fields generated via the mismatch between the template and target-image volumes constrained to be the solution of a Navier-Stokes fluid model. As part of this procedure, the Jacobian of the transformation is tracked, insuring the generation of diffeomorphisms. It is shown that transformations constrained by quadratic regularization methods such as the Laplacian, biharmonic, and linear elasticity models, do not ensure that the transformation maintains topology and, therefore, must only be used for coarse global registration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space
Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 · Cited by 3,431 · cited 1×
“The most straightforward methods of registration assume that the images or tissues being matched are highly similar for which the variability of only global course features are accommodated via affine transformations [11], [21], [22].”
Method
Cited by
A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Ageing in 465 Normal Adult Human Brains
Good, C. D., Johnsrude, I. S., Ashburner, J., Henson, R. N. A., Friston, K. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 · Cited by 4,561
Deformable medical image registration: a survey
Sotiras, A., Davatzikos, C., & Paragios, N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2013.2265603 · Cited by 1,587
“[31] presented a hierarchical way to recover the transformations for brain anatomy.”
BackgroundSchuff, N., Woerner, N., Boreta, L., Kornfield, T., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., Thompson, P. M., Jack, C. R., Weiner, M. W., & Initiative, T. A. D. N. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awp007 · Cited by 679
Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey
Iglesias, J. E., & Sabuncu, M. R. (2015) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2015.06.012 · Cited by 667
Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline
Grenander, U., & Miller, M. I. (1998) · Quarterly of Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1090/qam/1668732 · Cited by 623
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, G. E., Joshi, S. C., & Miller, M. I.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 864-877
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157502851
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/42.650882
- The paper
- Christensen, G. E., Joshi, S. C., & Miller, M. I. (1997). Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.650882
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.