The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of E-Learning by University Students in Malaysian Higher Educational Institutions: A Case in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines university students' intention to utilize e-learning. In this paper, we apply and use the theory of a technology acceptance model. We employ the structural equation modeling approach with a SmartPLS software to investigate students' adoption process. Findings indicate that the content of e-learning and self-efficacy has a positive impact and substantially associated with perceived usefulness and student satisfaction, which impact university students' intention to utilize e-learning. Although e-learning has gained acceptance in universities around the world, the study of the intention to use e-learning is still largely unexplored in Malaysia. The developed model is employed to explain the university student's intention to utilize e-learning. The study concludes that university students in Malaysia have positive perceptions toward e-learning and intend to practice it for educational purposes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“social mass media for e-learning [4]”
From Integrated Three Theories to Develop a Model of Factors Affecting Students' Academic Performance in Higher Education (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“In addition, social media network usage facilitates to build positive relation amid students' educational performance and students' satisfaction [3], [4], [18], [43].”
From Integrated Three Theories to Develop a Model of Factors Affecting Students' Academic Performance in Higher Education (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Reasonably, empirical evidence recommended that on-campus students required additional support in using social media for collaboration compared with face-to-face discussions [3], [4], [11], [14], [46].”
From Integrated Three Theories to Develop a Model of Factors Affecting Students' Academic Performance in Higher Education (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202 · Cited by 21,631
Determining sample size for research activities
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447003000308 · Cited by 18,930
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,833
The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction
Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248851 · Cited by 2,572
Lee, M.-C. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002 · Cited by 1,385
Liaw, S. (2008) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005 · Cited by 1,246
Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models
Selim, H. M. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004 · Cited by 1,055
The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use
Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y.-K. (2004) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007 · Cited by 984
Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance
Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. (2006) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006 · Cited by 863
Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance
Hsu, M., & Chiu, C. (2003) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001 · Cited by 769
Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems
Wang, Y. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00028-4 · Cited by 743
User Acceptance of Computer Technology
DavisFred, D., BagozziRichard, P., & WarshawPaul, R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.5555/2797314.2797319 · Cited by 620
An instructional model for web‐based e‐learning education with a blended learning process approach
Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2005) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x · Cited by 576
Chen, C.-M., & Chung, C.-J. (2008) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.011 · Cited by 469
A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities
Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.028 · Cited by 448
Technology Acceptance Model and E-learning
Masrom, M. B., & Teknologi, U. (2007) · Cited by 363
Chow, M. C. M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T.-M., & Chan, K. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.011 · Cited by 340
Measuring Online Learning Systems Success: Applying the Updated DeLone and McLean Model
Lin, H. (2007) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9948 · Cited by 297
A person–artefact–task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments
Finneran, C. M., & Zhang, P. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00112-5 · Cited by 284
Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Zeki, A. M. (2017) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.09.002 · Cited by 214
Self-citationAl-Rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2326 · Cited by 146
Self-citationChaka, J. G., & Govender, I. (2017) · South African Journal of Education · doi:10.15700/saje.v37n1a1282 · Cited by 92
Al-rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Mi Yusuf, L. (2015) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s2p625 · Cited by 81
Self-citationMayisela, T. (2013) · South African Journal of Education · doi:10.15700/saje.v33n1a629 · Cited by 69
Leem, J., & Lim, B. (2007) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v8i1.380 · Cited by 64
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p299 · Cited by 57
Self-citationHow Could MOOCs Become Accessible? The Case of edX and the Future of Inclusive Online Learning
Sánchez-Gordón, S., & Luján‐Mora, S. (2020) · TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology) · doi:10.3217/jucs-022-01-0055 · Cited by 57
Computers and the Internet as a job assisted tool: based on the three-tier use model approach
Liaw, S.-S. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.018 · Cited by 55
Quality in European e-learning: An introduction
Ehlers, U., & Pawlowski, J. Μ. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-32788-6_1 · Cited by 53
Enhancing intercultural understanding using e-learning strategies
Meier, C. (2007) · South African Journal of Education · doi:10.4314/saje.v27i4.25138 · Cited by 45
Puteh, M., & Ibrahim, M. (2010) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.061 · Cited by 32
Towards a Semantic Definition of a Framework to Implement Accessible e-Learning Projects
Amado-Salvatierra, H. R., Hilera, J. R., Piedra, N., Rizzardini, R. H., & Otón, S. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.3217/jucs-022-07-0921 · Cited by 26
Social Media and its Impact on Academic Performance among University Students
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Zeki, A. M., Alias, N. B., & Saged, A. A. G. (2017) · The Anthropologist · doi:10.1080/09720073.2017.1317962 · Cited by 17
Self-citationE-learning environment integration in the chemical engineering educational process
Krajnc, M. S. (2009) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 4
Strategies for enhancing e-learning implementation in UTM
Yahya, Y. Q. (2009) · Cited by 3
Ali, M. F., Said, M. N. H. M., & Ngu, L. L. (2006) · Cited by 1
Improvement of e-learning in term of communication
Razak, N. A. (2010) · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- mohamed, 2011, Summary of Findings on the Status Trends and Challenges of e-Learning Implementation, 107
- zaidan, 2011, E-Learning Governance in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions, 20
- bandura, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action A Social Cognitive Theory
- 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salloum, S. A., Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2939467 · Cited by 651
Pham, L. K., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3 · Cited by 583
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2899368 · Cited by 435
Self-citationAbuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. M., & Darwish, M. S. J. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z · Cited by 529
Self-citationAnthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2020) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., Saged, A. A., & Abdul Rahman, N. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
- King Saud University (SA)
- University of Malaya (MY)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 14268-14276
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791192301
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 33.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
- UMP Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Pahang) (acceptedVersion)
- The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Research Management Centre at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (PY/2015/05399/R.J130000.7826.4F795)
- Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University (RG-1438-062)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- e-learning adoption, university students, technology acceptance model, intention to use, perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, student satisfaction, e-learning content, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysian higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review