Cited by 45Cloud Data Security SolutionsCryptography and Data SecurityBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

Cloud storage for electronic health records based on secret sharing with verifiable reconstruction outsourcing

Open access
Zhang, Hanlin, Yu, Jia, Tian, Chengliang, Zhao, Pu, Xu, Guobin, Lin, Jie·2018·IEEE Access

Abstract

Deploying electronic health records (EHRs) is now an undisputable trend in healthcare systems. Through affording benefits like flexibility and low cost, the cutting-cloud cloud storage is becoming a popular solution to store a massive amount of EHRs to depress the local storage. Nevertheless, storing sensitive information such as health records on the cloud incurs severe security and privacy risks. In this paper, we propose a novel cloud storage system for EHRs which fully ensures the data privacy by employing the Shamir's secret sharing. In this system, an EHR is divided into multiple segments by a healthcare center, and the segments are distributed to numerous cloud servers. When retrieving the EHR, the healthcare center captures segments from partial cloud servers and reconstructs the EHRs. Meanwhile, in reality, the reconstruction of a shared EHR could be much burdensome for a healthcare center or a patient, we thus propose a practical cloud storage scheme which outsources the reconstruction of a shared EHR to a cloud computing service provider. Such a solution can drastically boost the efficiency of the proposed scheme. As far as we know, our scheme is the first to define reconstruction outsourcing concept in all cloud storage schemes for EHRs based on secret sharing, and the results of outsourcing reconstruction can be verified by healthcare centers or patients in our scheme. The theoretical analysis and experimental results also support that our proposed scheme is secure and efficient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2857205

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Yu, J., Tian, C., Zhao, P., Xu, G., & Lin, J.
Affiliations
  • Qingdao University (CN)
  • Frostburg State University (US)
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2018
Volume
6
Pages
40713-40722
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884589932
Cited by
45
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61702294, 61572267, 61272425, 61402245)
  • Anhui University
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (2017-MS-21, 2016-MS-23)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2016FQ02)
  • National Cryptography Development Fund (MMJJ20170126, MMJJ20170118)
  • Applied Basic Research Project of Qingdao City (17-1-1-10-jch)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
electronic health records, cloud storage, secret sharing, Shamir secret sharing, data privacy, healthcare data security, data segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review