Cited by 339Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningDigital Media Forensic Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combating Deepfake Videos Using Blockchain and Smart Contracts

Open access
Hasan, Haya R., Salah, Khaled·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning techniques, fake digital contents have proliferated in recent years. Fake footage, images, audios, and videos (known as deepfakes) can be a scary and dangerous phenomenon and can have the potential of altering the truth and eroding trust by giving false reality. Proof of authenticity (PoA) of digital media is critical to help eradicate the epidemic of forged content. Current solutions lack the ability to provide history tracking and provenance of digital media. In this paper, we provide a solution and a general framework using Ethereum smart contracts to trace and track the provenance and history of digital content to its original source even if the digital content is copied multiple times. The smart contract utilizes the hashes of the interplanetary file system (IPFS) used to store digital content and its metadata. Our solution focuses on video content, but the solution framework provided in this paper is generic enough and can be applied to any other form of digital content. Our solution relies on the principle that if the content can be credibly traced to a trusted or reputable source, the content can then be real and authentic. The full code of the smart contract has been made publicly available at Github.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2905689

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 2019, IPFS is the Distributed Web
  2. 2019, Optimizing your Solidity Contracts Gas Usage
  3. 2019, Are Deepfakes the New Fakenews?
  4. 2019, The Civil White Paper
  5. 2019, How Faking Videos Became EasyÂ?and why that’s so Scary
  6. 2019, ETH gas station
  7. 2019, Is your Certificate of Authenticity Worth the Paper it’s Printed on?
  8. 2019, What Counts as an Artwork Proof of Authenticity
  9. 2019, Lawmakers Warn of ‘Deepfake’ Videos Ahead of 2020 Elections
  10. 2019, Art Provenance What it is and How to Verify it
  11. 2019, When Seeing is no Longer Believing Inside the Pentagon’s Race Against Deepfake Videos
  12. 2019, Deepfake-Busting Apps can Spot Even a Single Pixel Out of Place
  13. 2019, Fight AI With AI! Code Taught to Finger Naughty Deepfake Vids Made by Machine-Learning Algos
  14. 2019, Authenticity Verification of User Generated Video Files
  15. 2019, Ethereum Name Service
  16. 2019, Originalmy Products

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Hasan, H. R., & Salah, K.
Affiliations
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
41596-41606
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2920877282
Cited by
339
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 21
FWCI
54.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
deepfakes, video authenticity, blockchain, smart contracts, Ethereum, IPFS, content provenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review