Cited by 37Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Daily Locomotion Recognition and Prediction: A Kinematic Data-Based Machine Learning Approach

Open access
Figueiredo, Joana, Carvalho, Simao P., Goncalve, Diogo, Moreno, Juan C., Santos, Cristina P.·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

More versatile, user-independent tools for recognizing and predicting locomotion modes (LMs) and LM transitions (LMTs) in natural gaits are still needed. This study tackles these challenges by proposing an automatic, user-independent recognition and prediction tool using easily wearable kinematic motion sensors for innovatively classifying several LMs (walking direction, level-ground walking, ascend and descend stairs, and ascend and descend ramps) and respective LMTs. We compared diverse state-of-the-art feature processing and dimensionality reduction methods and machine-learning classifiers to find an effective tool for recognition and prediction of LMs and LMTs. The comparison included kinematic patterns from 10 able-bodied subjects. The more accurate tools were achieved using min-max scaling [-1; 1] interval and “mRMR plus forward selection” algorithm for feature normalization and dimensionality reduction, respectively, and Gaussian support vector machine classifier. The developed tool was accurate in the recognition (accuracy >99% and >96%) and prediction (accuracy >99% and >93%) of daily LMs and LMTs, respectively, using exclusively kinematic data. The use of kinematic data yielded an effective recognition and prediction tool, predicting the LMs and LMTs one-step-ahead. This timely prediction is relevant for assistive devices providing personalized assistance in daily scenarios. The kinematic data-based machine learning tool innovatively addresses several LMs and LMTs while allowing the user to self-select the leading limb to perform LMTs, ensuring a natural gait.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.2971552

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Figueiredo, J., Carvalho, S. P., Goncalve, D., Moreno, J. C., & Santos, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
33250-33262
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005390993
Cited by
37
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/108309/2015, SFRH/BD/147878/2019)
  • FEDER Funds through the Programa Operacional Regional do Norte
  • European Regional Development Fund (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-030386, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006941)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
locomotion mode recognition, kinematic data, wearable motion sensors, gait classification, stair climbing, level walking, walking direction, feature selection, dimensionality reduction, support vector machine, assistive devices, user-independent recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review