Cited by 406Imbalanced Data Classification TechniquesMachine Learning and Data ClassificationData Mining and Machine Learning Applications

A Comparison of MCC and CEN Error Measures in Multi-Class Prediction

Open access
Jurman, Giuseppe, Riccadonna, Samantha, Furlanello, Cesare·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

We show that the Confusion Entropy, a measure of performance in multiclass problems has a strong (monotone) relation with the multiclass generalization of a classical metric, the Matthews Correlation Coefficient. Analytical results are provided for the limit cases of general no-information (n-face dice rolling) of the binary classification. Computational evidence supports the claim in the general case.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0041882

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Landgrebe T, Duin R (2005) On Neyman-Pearson optimisation for multiclass classifiers. In: Proceedings 16th Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa. PRASA, pp. 165–170.
  2. [12]Landgrebe T, Duin R (2006) A simplified extension of the Area under the ROC to the multiclass domain. In: Proceedings 17th Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa. PRASA, pp. 241–245.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jurman, G., Riccadonna, S., & Furlanello, C.
Affiliations
Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT)
Corresponding author
Jurman, Giuseppe
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
e41882
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988301066
Cited by
406
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
Matthews correlation coefficient, multi-class classification, generalization, binary classification, monotonicity
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computers, Genotype, Probability, ROC Curve, Software, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Entropy, Computational Biology, Area Under Curve, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review