Cited by 36Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingGait Recognition and Analysis

Harmonic Loss Function for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks

Open access
Hu, Yue, Zhang, Xiao-Qing, Xu, Li, Xian He, Feng, Tian, Zhao, She, Wei, Liu, Wei·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) has been a very popular field in both real practice and theoretical research. Over the years, a number of many-vs-one Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models have been proposed for the sensor-based HAR problem. However, how to utilize sequence outputs of them to improve the HAR performance has not been studied seriously. To solve this problem, we present a novel loss function named harmonic loss, which is utilized to improve the overall classification performance of HAR based on baseline LSTM networks. First, label replication method is presented to duplicate true labels at each sequence step in many-vs-one LSTM networks, thus each sequence step can generate a local error and a local output. Then, considering the importance of different local errors and inspired by the Ebbinghaus memory curve, the harmonic loss is proposed to give unequal weights to different local errors based on harmonic series equation. Additionally, to improve the overall classification performance of HAR, integrated methods are utilized to exploit the sequence outputs of LSTM models based on harmonic loss and ensemble learning strategy. Finally, based on the LSTM model construction and hyper-parameter setting, extensive experiments are conducted. A series of experimental results demonstrate that our harmonic loss significantly achieves higher macro-F1 and accuracy than strong baselines on two public HAR benchmarks. Compared with previous state-of-art methods, our proposed methods can achieve competitive classification performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.3003162

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • [200] proposes a harmonic loss function and [207] combines LSTM with batch normalization to achieve 92% accuracy with raw accelerometer and gyroscope data.

    “For example, [200] proposes a harmonic loss function and [207] combines LSTM with batch normalization to achieve 92% accuracy with raw accelerometer and gyroscope data.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. D. Anguita, A. Ghio, L. Oneto, X. Parra, and J. R. Reyes-Ortiz, ''Energy efficient smartphone-based activity recognition using fixed-point arith- metic,'' J. Universal Comput. Sci., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1295-1314, 2013.
  2. M. MacKay, P. Vicol, J. Ba, and R. B. Grosse, ''Reversible recurrent neural networks,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2018, pp. 9029-9040.
  3. E. Choi, M. T. Bahadori, A. Schuetz, W. F. Stewart, and J. Sun, ''Doctor AI: Predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks,'' in Proc. Mach. Learn. Healthcare Conf., 2016, pp. 301-318.
  4. H.-Y. Chen, P.-H. Wang, C.-H. Liu, S.-C. Chang, J.-Y. Pan, Y.-T. Chen, W. Wei, and D.-C. Juan, ''Complement objective training,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2019, pp. 1-11. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=HyM7AiA5YX
  5. WEI SHE (Member, IEEE) received the B.S. degree in control engineering from the Air Defence Academy of PLA, in 2000, the M.S. degree in software engineering from Hunan Uni- versity, in 2008, and the Ph.D. degree in computer software and theory from Zhengzhou University, China, in 2013. He is currently an Associate Pro- fessor with the College of Software, Zhengzhou University. His research interests include informa- tion security, the energy Internet, and the Internet healthcare.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, Y., Zhang, X.-Q., Xu, L., Xian He, F., Tian, Z., She, W., & Liu, W.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
135617-135627
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045503191
Cited by
36
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Open Project Fund of the Research Center on Levee Safety Disaster Prevention (2018007)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2018YFB1201403)
  • CERNET Innovation Project (NGII20180702)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, sensor-based activity recognition, ensemble learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review