Cited by 45Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningSpam and Phishing Detection

Cyberbullying Detection Based on Emotion

Open access
Al-Hashedi, Mohammed, Soon, Lay-Ki, Goh, Hui-Ngo, Lim, Amy Hui Lan, Siew, Eu-Gene·2023·IEEE Access

Abstract

Due to the detrimental consequences caused by cyberbullying, a great deal of research has been undertaken to propose effective techniques to resolve this reoccurring problem. The research presented in this paper is motivated by the fact that negative emotions can be caused by cyberbullying. This paper proposes cyberbullying detection models that are trained based on contextual, emotions and sentiment features. An Emotion Detection Model (EDM) was constructed using Twitter datasets that have been improved in terms of its annotations. Emotions and sentiment were extracted from cyberbullying datasets using EDM and lexicons based. Two cyberbullying datasets from Wikipedia and Twitter respectively were further improved by comprehensive annotation of emotion and sentiment features. The results show that anger, fear and guilt were the major emotions associated with cyberbullying. Subsequently, the extracted emotions were used as features in addition to contextual and sentiment features to train models for cyberbullying detection. The results demonstrate that using emotion features and sentiment has improved the performance of detecting cyberbullying by 0.5 to 0.6 recall. The proposed models also outperformed the state-of-the-art models by a 0.7 f1-score. The main contribution of this work is two-fold, which includes a comprehensive emotion-annotated dataset for cyberbullying detection, and an empirical proof of emotions as effective features for cyberbullying detection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2023.3280556

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. L. Cheng, J. Li, Y. N. Silva, D. L. Hall, and H. Liu, ''XBully: Cyberbullying detection within a multi-modal context,'' in Proc. 12th ACM Int. Conf. Web Search Data Mining, Jan. 2019, pp. 339-347.
  2. Z. Yang, Z. Dai, Y. Yang, J. Carbonell, R. R. Salakhutdinov, and Q. V. Le, ''XLNet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understand- ing,'' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, Eds. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/file/dc6a7e655d7e5840e66733 e9ee67cc69-Paper.pdf
  3. A. G. Shahraki and O. R. Zaiane, ''Lexical and learning-based emotion mining from text,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Linguistics Intell. Text Process., vol. 9, 2017, pp. 24-55.
  4. S. Mohammad, ''# emotional tweets,'' in Proc. 6th Int. Workshop Semantic Eval., 2012, pp. 246-255.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Hashedi, M., Soon, L.-K., Goh, H.-N., Lim, A. H. L., & Siew, E.-G.
Affiliations
  • Multimedia University (MY)
  • Monash University Malaysia (MY)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2023
Volume
11
Pages
53907-53918
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378713756
Cited by
45
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Siti Hasmah Digital Library-MMU Institutiona Repository (Multimedia University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, Ministry of Education, Malaysia (FRGS/1/2017/ICT02/MMU/02/6)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying detection, emotion recognition, sentiment analysis, Twitter, Wikipedia, anger, fear, guilt, contextual features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review