Cited by 171Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

An international systematic review of cyberbullying measurements

Chun, JongSerl, Lee, Jungup, Kim, Jinyung, Lee, Serim·2020·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106485

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chun, J., Lee, J., Kim, J., & Lee, S.
Affiliations
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Chun, JongSerl
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
113
Pages
106485
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044785475
Cited by
171
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018S1A5A2A01034744)
  • Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyber victimization, cyberbullying perpetration, scale development, definition of cyberbullying, construct validity, reliability statistics, measurement standardization, social media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review