Cited by 239Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies

Camerini, Anne-Linda, Marciano, Laura, Carrara, Anna, Schulz, Peter J.·2020·Telematics and Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101362

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camerini, A.-L., Marciano, L., Carrara, A., & Schulz, P. J.
Affiliations
Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Corresponding author
Camerini, Anne-Linda
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
49
Pages
101362
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003531241
Cited by
239
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyberbullying perpetration, cyber victimization, children, adolescents, junior high school students, traditional bullying, internalizing problems, problematic internet use, parent-adolescent relationships, peer relationships, risk factors, prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review