Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data-Driven Methodology for Knowledge Graph Generation Within the Tourism Domain

Chessa, Alessandro, Fenu, Gianni, Motta, Enrico, Osborne, Francesco, Reforgiato Recupero, Diego, Salatino, Angelo, Secchi, Luca·2023·IEEE Access

Abstract

The tourism and hospitality sectors have become increasingly important in the last few years and the companies operating in this field are constantly challenged with providing new innovative services. At the same time, (big-) data has become the “new oil” of this century and Knowledge Graphs are emerging as the most natural way to collect, refine, and structure this heterogeneous information. In this paper, we present a methodology for semi-automatic generating a Tourism Knowledge Graph (TKG), which can be used for supporting a variety of intelligent services in this space, and a new ontology for modelling this domain, the Tourism Analytics Ontology (TAO). Our approach processes and integrates data from Booking.com, Airbnb, DBpedia, and GeoNames. Due to its modular structure, it can be easily extended to include new data sources or to apply new enrichment and refinement functions. We report a comprehensive evaluation of the functional, logical, and structural dimensions of TKG and TAO.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2023.3292153

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Chaves, Towards a multilingual ontology for ontology-driven content mining in social web sites, 687, 1
  2. Consoli, Towards emergency vehicle routing using geolinked open data: The case study of the municipality of Catania, 1329, 31
  3. Ou, Development and alignment of a domain-specific ontology for question answering, 2221
  4. Delpeuch, 2019, OpenTapioca: Lightweight entity linking for Wikidata, arXiv:1904.09131 · arXiv
  5. Dimou, RML: A generic language for integrated RDF mappings of heterogeneous data, 1184, 1
  6. Dimou, Automated metadata generation for linked data generation and publishing workflows, 1593, 1
  7. Verborgh, Web-scale querying through linked data fragments, 1184
  8. Gangemi, Modelling ontology evaluation and valilidation, 15
  9. Bordes, Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data, 2, 2787
  10. Shuyo, 2010, Language Detection Library for Java
  11. 10.1145/2063518.2063519 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Chessa, A., Fenu, G., Motta, E., Osborne, F., Reforgiato Recupero, D., Salatino, A., & Secchi, L.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2023
Volume
11
Pages
67567-67599
ISSN
2169-3536
Cited by
40
References
53

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.