Cited by 383Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

NeoDTI: neural integration of neighbor information from a heterogeneous network for discovering new drug–target interactions

Open access
Wan, Fangping, Hong, Lixiang, Xiao, An, Jiang, Tao, Zeng, Jianyang·2019·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Accurately predicting drug–target interactions (DTIs) in silico can guide the drug discovery process and thus facilitate drug development. Computational approaches for DTI prediction that adopt the systems biology perspective generally exploit the rationale that the properties of drugs and targets can be characterized by their functional roles in biological networks. Results: Inspired by recent advance of information passing and aggregation techniques that generalize the convolution neural networks to mine large-scale graph data and greatly improve the performance of many network-related prediction tasks, we develop a new nonlinear end-to-end learning model, called NeoDTI, that integrates diverse information from heterogeneous network data and automatically learns topology-preserving representations of drugs and targets to facilitate DTI prediction. The substantial prediction performance improvement over other state-of-the-art DTI prediction methods as well as several novel predicted DTIs with evidence supports from previous studies have demonstrated the superior predictive power of NeoDTI. In addition, NeoDTI is robust against a wide range of choices of hyperparameters and is ready to integrate more drug and target related information (e.g. compound–protein binding affinity data). All these results suggest that NeoDTI can offer a powerful and robust tool for drug development and drug repositioning. Availability and implementation: The source code and data used in NeoDTI are available at: https://github.com/FangpingWan/NeoDTI. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty543

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Producing atom-centered representations based on a weighted combination of neighbors' features using attention can model interactions among reactants for predicting organic reaction outcomes.

    “Producing atom-centered representations based on a weighted combination of their neighbors’ features (i.e., using an attention mechanism) is able to model interactions among reactants for predicting organic reaction outcomes [167].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [167]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Precup,D. and Teh,Y.W. (ed.) Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 1263-1272, International Convention Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  2. Hamilton,W. et al. (2017). Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In: Guyon,I. et al. (ed.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30. Curran Associates, Inc, New York, pp. 1025-1035.
  3. van Laarhoven,T. and Marchiori,E. (2014) Biases of drug-target interaction network data. In: IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics, Springer, Berlin, pp. 23-33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wan, F., Hong, L., Xiao, A., Jiang, T., & Zeng, J.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Zeng, Jianyang
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2018-07-02
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
104-111
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2952522777
Cited by
381
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
FWCI
19.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61472205, 81630103)
  • China’s Youth 1000-Talent Program
  • Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology
  • US National Science Foundation (IIS-1646333)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
drug-target interaction prediction, heterogeneous networks, graph neural networks, drug discovery, drug repurposing
MeSH terms
Drug Development, Computer Simulation, Protein Binding, Software, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review