Cited by 15Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataData Stream Mining TechniquesPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Privacy Preserving Time-Series Forecasting of User Health Data Streams

Open access
Imtiaz, Sana, Horchidan, Sonia-Florina, Abbas, Zainab, Arsalan, Muhammad, Chaudhry, Hassan Nazeer, Vlassov, Vladimir·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)

Abstract

Privacy preservation plays a vital role in health care applications as the requirements for privacy preservation are very strict in this domain. With the rapid increase in the amount, quality and detail of health data being gathered with smart devices, new mechanisms are required that can cope with the challenges of large scale and real-time processing requirements. Federated learning (FL) is one of the conventional approaches that facilitate the training of AI models without access to the raw data. However, recent studies have shown that FL alone does not guarantee sufficient privacy. Differential privacy (DP) is a well-known approach for privacy guarantees, however, because of the noise addition, DP needs to make a trade-off between privacy and accuracy. In this work, we design and implement an end-to-end pipeline using DP and FL for the first time in the context of health data streams. We propose a clustering mechanism to leverage the similarities between users to improve the prediction accuracy as well as significantly reduce the model training time. Depending on the dataset and features, our predictions are no more than 0.025% far off the ground-truth value with respect to the range of value. Moreover, our clustering mechanism brings a significant reduction in the training time, with up to 49% reduction in prediction accuracy error in the best case, as compared to training a single model on the entire dataset. Our proposed privacy preserving mechanism at best introduces a decrease of ≈ 2% in the prediction accuracy of the trained models. Furthermore, our proposed clustering mechanism reduces the prediction error even in highly noisy settings by as much as 38% as compared to using a single federated private model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378186

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An end-to-end pipeline consisting of federated learning and differential privacy for health data streams using clustering reduces model training time with high accuracy, and prediction accuracy only decreases by 2% due to differential privacy.

    “An end-to-end pipeline consisting of FL and DR is proposed for health data streams using a clustering mechanism to reduce model training time with high accuracy [31]. DP mechanism is used by the system to provide privacy guarantees and results showed that prediction accuracy only decreases by 2% for the trained model due to this change.”
  • Differential privacy provides an effective mechanism to safeguard the exchange of ML model parameters from clients to FL or edge server.

    “The differential privacy approach provides an effective mechanism to safeguard the exchange of ML model parameters from clients to FL or edge server [27,28,29,31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Imtiaz, S., Horchidan, S.-F., Abbas, Z., Arsalan, M., Chaudhry, H. N., & Vlassov, V.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-12-10
Pages
3428-3437
OpenAlex
W3138774967
Cited by
15
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
privacy-preserving machine learning, federated learning, differential privacy, time series forecasting, privacy-accuracy trade-off, smart devices, real-time data processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review