The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Standards for Machine-to-Machine and the Internet of Things
Abstract
Over the last decade, there has been a growing research interest in machine-to-machine communications and the Internet of Things (IoT) as a milestone embodiment of the continuous convergence between the physical facet of human activities and its reflection on the information world. IoT is understood as the (r)evolutionary transition into an era where physical assets and virtual assets will be treated uniformly and, for all intents and purposes, be largely indistinguishable to the processes involving them. The sheer scale of IoT suggests that harmonized global standards will be paramount in realizing a seamless treatment across the physical facet and the virtual facet of things. In this paper, we survey the-;admittedly babelian-standardization landscape of IoT and present its major efforts. Our survey concludes with a comparative discussion that highlights the key challenges of future standardization in IoT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., & Bormann, C. (2014) · doi:10.17487/rfc7252 · Cited by 2,605 · cited 12×
“This leverages the OAuth Token Introspection mechanism in defining a protocol mapping to CoAP for resource-constrained devices.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
(2012) · doi:10.17487/rfc6749 · Cited by 1,383
Cited by
Applications of Blockchains in the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey
Ali, M. S., Vecchio, M., Pincheira, M., Dolui, K., Antonelli, F., & Rehmani, M. H. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2886932 · Cited by 855
Securing Fog Computing for Internet of Things Applications: Challenges and Solutions
Ni, J., Zhang, K., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2762345 · Cited by 659
Verma, S., Kawamoto, Y., Fadlullah, Z. M., Nishiyama, H., & Kato, N. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2694469 · Cited by 422
Full spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks toward 5G: a survey
Hu, F., Chen, B., & Zhu, K. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2802450 · Cited by 321
The Security of Big Data in Fog-Enabled IoT Applications Including Blockchain: A Survey
Tariq, N., Asim, M., Al-Obeidat, F., Zubair Farooqi, M., Baker, T., Hammoudeh, M., & Ghafir, I. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19081788 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Gazis, V.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 482-511
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2495824885
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Standards for Machine-to-Machine and the Internet of Things. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2016.2592948
- The paper
- Gazis, V. (2017). A Survey of Standards for Machine-to-Machine and the Internet of Things. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2016.2592948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
