Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,463

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recognizing indoor scenes

Open access
Quattoni, Ariadna, Torralba, Antonio·2009·2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Indoor scene recognition is a challenging open problem in high level vision. Most scene recognition models that work well for outdoor scenes perform poorly in the indoor domain. The main difficulty is that while some indoor scenes (e.g. corridors) can be well characterized by global spatial properties, others (e.g, bookstores) are better characterized by the objects they contain. More generally, to address the indoor scenes recognition problem we need a model that can exploit local and global discriminative information. In this paper we propose a prototype based model that can successfully combine both sources of information. To test our approach we created a dataset of 67 indoor scenes categories (the largest available) covering a wide range of domains. The results show that our approach can significantly outperform a state of the art classifier for the task.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206537

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/CAIVD.1998.646032 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1109/ICCV.2003.1238354 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1109/CVPR.2006.326 · DOI · Paper page
  5. sivic, 2006, Video Google: Efficient visual search of videos, Toward Category-Level Object Recognition, 4170, 127, 10.1007/11957959_7 · DOI
  6. ponce, 2006, Dataset issues in object recognition, In toward Category-Level Object Recognition, 29, 10.1007/11957959_2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587637 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/CVPR.2005.16 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1023/A:1011139631724 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/978-3-540-79860-6_1 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/CVPR.1997.609407 · DOI · Paper page
  12. hays, 2007, Scene completion using millions of photographs, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 26, 10.1145/1276377.1276382 · DOI · Paper page
  13. frome, 2007, Learning globallyconsistent local distance functions for shape-based image retrieval and classification, Computer Vision 2007 ICCV 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on, 1
  14. 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587462 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,463

Metadata

Authors
Quattoni, A., & Torralba, A.
Venue
2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2009-06
Pages
413-420
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152161678
Cited by
1,463
References
2
FWCI
34.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognizing indoor scenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206537
The paper
Quattoni, A., & Torralba, A. (2009). Recognizing indoor scenes. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.