Cited by 1,831Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningRemote-Sensing Image Classification

Semantic Understanding of Scenes Through the ADE20K Dataset

Open access
Zhou, Bolei, Zhao, Hang, Puig, Xavier, Xiao, Tete, Fidler, Sanja, Barriuso, Adela, Torralba, Antonio·2019·International Journal of Computer Vision

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11263-018-1140-0

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing segmentation datasets can hardly support LUSS due to the large image complexity but small data scale.

    “Existing segmentation datasets can hardly support LUSS due to the large image complexity but small data scale.”

    From Large-Scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes limitations in existing segmentation datasets’ object and scene coverage, and Table 1 (p. 8) compares their image counts and objects per image. These passages support concerns about dataset coverage and scale, but the paper does not assess whether those datasets can support LUSS or attribute any such difficulty to the combination of image complexity and small data scale. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. He K, Gkioxari G, Doll´ ar P, Girshick R (2017) Mask r-cnn. In: Proc. ICCV

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, B., Zhao, H., Puig, X., Xiao, T., Fidler, S., Barriuso, A., & Torralba, A.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Bolei
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
2018-12-07
Volume
127
Issue
3
Pages
302-321
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W2507296351
Cited by
1,831
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 211 · 2025: 295 · 2024: 354 · 2023: 295 · 2022: 199 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 8
FWCI
54.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1524817)
  • Samsung
  • Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
Keywords
ADE20K, scene understanding, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, scene parsing, pixel-wise annotation, everyday scenes, object parts, benchmark dataset, batch size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review