Cited by 495Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsFace recognition and analysisHuman Pose and Action Recognition

PANDA: Pose Aligned Networks for Deep Attribute Modeling

Open access
Zhang, Ning, Paluri, Manohar, Ranzato, Marc'Aurelio, Darrell, Trevor, Bourdev, Lubomir·2014·2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

We propose a method for inferring human attributes (such as gender, hair style, clothes style, expression, action) from images of people under large variation of viewpoint, pose, appearance, articulation and occlusion. Convolutional Neural Nets (CNN) have been shown to perform very well on large scale object recognition problems. In the context of attribute classification, however, the signal is often subtle and it may cover only a small part of the image, while the image is dominated by the effects of pose and viewpoint. Discounting for pose variation would require training on very large labeled datasets which are not presently available. Part-based models, such as poselets [4] and DPM [12] have been shown to perform well for this problem but they are limited by shallow low-level features. We propose a new method which combines part-based models and deep learning by training pose-normalized CNNs. We show substantial improvement vs. state-of-the-art methods on challenging attribute classification tasks in unconstrained settings. Experiments confirm that our method outperforms both the best part-based methods on this problem and conventional CNNs trained on the full bounding box of the person.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2014.212

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, N., Paluri, M., Ranzato, M., Darrell, T., & Bourdev, L.
Affiliations
  • Meta (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-06
Pages
1637-1644
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147414309
Cited by
495
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 13
FWCI
38.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1134072, 0905647, 1212798)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
pose normalization, part-based models, person re-identification, viewpoint variation, occlusion, gender classification, clothing style, facial expressions, human action recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review