Cited by 306Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsHuman Pose and Action Recognition

What Can Help Pedestrian Detection?

Open access
Mao, Jiayuan, Xiao, Tete, Jiang, Yuning, Cao, Zhimin·2017·2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Aggregating extra features has been considered as an effective approach to boost traditional pedestrian detection methods. However, there is still a lack of studies on whether and how CNN-based pedestrian detectors can benefit from these extra features. The first contribution of this paper is exploring this issue by aggregating extra features into CNN-based pedestrian detection framework. Through extensive experiments, we evaluate the effects of different kinds of extra features quantitatively. Moreover, we propose a novel network architecture, namely HyperLearner, to jointly learn pedestrian detection as well as the given extra feature. By multi-task training, HyperLearner is able to utilize the information of given features and improve detection performance without extra inputs in inference. The experimental results on multiple pedestrian benchmarks validate the effectiveness of the proposed HyperLearner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2017.639

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many recent pedestrian detection methods are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.

    “Many recent pedestrian detection methods [62], [63], [71], [55], [70], [57], [56] are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mao, J., Xiao, T., Jiang, Y., & Cao, Z.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Megvii (China) (CN)
Venue
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
6034-6043
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613599172
Cited by
306
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 33
FWCI
12.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
pedestrian detection, multi-task learning, representation learning, network architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review