Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mimicking Very Efficient Network for Object Detection

Li, Quanquan, Jin, Shengying, Yan, Junjie·2017·2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
DOI 10.1109/cvpr.2017.776
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Current CNN based object detectors need initialization from pre-trained ImageNet classification models, which are usually time-consuming. In this paper, we present a fully convolutional feature mimic framework to train very efficient CNN based detectors, which do not need ImageNet pre-training and achieve competitive performance as the large and slow models. We add supervision from high-level features of the large networks in training to help the small network better learn object representation. More specifically, we conduct a mimic method for the features sampled from the entire feature map and use a transform layer to map features from the small network onto the same dimension of the large network. In training the small network, we optimize the similarity between features sampled from the same region on the feature maps of both networks. Extensive experiments are conducted on pedestrian and common object detection tasks using VGG, Inception and ResNet. On both Caltech and Pascal VOC, we show that the modified 2.5× accelerated Inception network achieves competitive performance as the full Inception Network. Our faster model runs at 80 FPS for a 1000×1500 large input with only a minor degradation of performance on Caltech.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2017.776

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. zhang, 2015, Accelerating very deep convolutional networks for classification and detection
  2. urban, 2016, Do deep convolutional nets really need to be deep (or even convolutional)?
  3. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 · DOI · Paper page
  4. soudry, 2014, Expectation backpropagation: Parameter-free training of multilayer neural networks with continuous or discrete weights, Advances in neural information processing systems, 963
  5. simonyan, 2014, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-scale Image Recognition
  6. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.141 · DOI · Paper page
  7. zeiler, 2014, Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks, European Conference on Computer Vision, 818
  8. wu, 2015, Quantized convolutional neural networks for mobile devices
  9. esser, 2015, Backpropagation for energy-efficient neuromorphic computing, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1117
  10. 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587597 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 · DOI · Paper page
  12. han, 2015, Deep compression Compressing deep neural network with pruning trained quantization and huffman coding, abs 1510 149, 2
  13. he, 2014, Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition, European Conference on Computer Vision, 346
  14. huh, 2016, What makes imagenet good for transfer learning?
  15. bell, 2015, Inside-Outside Net Detecting Objects in Context with Skip Pooling and Recurrent Neural Networks
  16. dai, 2016, R-FCN Object Detection via Region-based Fully Convolutional Networks[J]
  17. romero, 2014, Fitnets Hints for thin deep nets
  18. courbariaux, 2015, Binaryconnect: Training deep neural networks with binary weights during propagations, Advances in neural information processing systems, 3123
  19. denton, 2014, Exploiting linear structure within convolutional networks for efficient evaluation, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1269
  20. ba, 2014, Do deep nets really need to be deep?, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2654
  21. 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.155 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.13 · DOI · Paper page
  23. jaderberg, 2014, Speeding up convolutional neural networks with low rank expansions
  24. krähenbühl, 2015, Data-dependent initializations of convolutional neural networks
  25. 10.1145/2647868.2654889 · DOI · Paper page
  26. lebedev, 2014, Speeding-up convolutional neural networks using fine-tuned cp-decomposition
  27. 10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_32 · DOI · Paper page
  28. liu, 2015, Ssd Single shot multibox detector

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
Li, Q., Jin, S., & Yan, J.
Venue
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
7341-7349
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/cvpr.2017.776
OpenAlex
W2750432752
Cited by
379
References
10
FWCI
6.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mimicking Very Efficient Network for Object Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2017.776
The paper
Li, Q., Jin, S., & Yan, J. (2017). Mimicking Very Efficient Network for Object Detection. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2017.776

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.