Cited by 836Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Image Generation from Scene Graphs

Open access
Johnson, Justin, Gupta, Agrim, Fei-Fei, Li·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

To truly understand the visual world our models should be able not only to recognize images but also generate them. To this end, there has been exciting recent progress on generating images from natural language descriptions. These methods give stunning results on limited domains such as descriptions of birds or flowers, but struggle to faithfully reproduce complex sentences with many objects and relationships. To overcome this limitation we propose a method for generating images from scene graphs, enabling explicitly reasoning about objects and their relationships. Our model uses graph convolution to process input graphs, computes a scene layout by predicting bounding boxes and segmentation masks for objects, and converts the layout to an image with a cascaded refinement network. The network is trained adversarially against a pair of discriminators to ensure realistic outputs. We validate our approach on Visual Genome and COCO-Stuff, where qualitative results, ablations, and user studies demonstrate our method's ability to generate complex images with multiple objects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00133

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing methods for generating images from scene graphs mainly predict an image-like layout from SGs and then generate images based on the layout.

    “Existing methods [85,106,140] mainly predict an image-like layout from SGs, and then generate images based on the layout.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J., Gupta, A., & Fei-Fei, L.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
1219-1228
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963184176
Cited by
836
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 180 · 2020: 149 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 6
FWCI
31.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
graph convolution, bounding box prediction, segmentation masks, adversarial training, Visual Genome, COCO-Stuff

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review