Cited by 667Advanced Vision and ImagingRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Learning Depth from Monocular Videos Using Direct Methods

Wang, Chaoyang, Buenaposada, Jose Miguel, Zhu, Rui, Lucey, Simon·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

The ability to predict depth from a single image - using recent advances in CNNs - is of increasing interest to the vision community. Unsupervised strategies to learning are particularly appealing as they can utilize much larger and varied monocular video datasets during learning without the need for ground truth depth or stereo. In previous works, separate pose and depth CNN predictors had to be determined such that their joint outputs minimized the photometric error. Inspired by recent advances in direct visual odometry (DVO), we argue that the depth CNN predictor can be learned without a pose CNN predictor. Further, we demonstrate empirically that incorporation of a differentiable implementation of DVO, along with a novel depth normalization strategy - substantially improves performance over state of the art that use monocular videos for training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00216

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous self-supervised monocular methods use LiDAR measurements at test time to scale depth estimates.

    “All, however, take advantage of constraints in monocular Structure-from-Motion (SfM) training that only allow the estimation of depth and pose up to an unknown scale factor, and rely on the ground-truth LiDAR measu,rements to scale their depth estimates appropriately for evaluation purposes [53].”

    From 3D Packing for Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2020) · cites this paper as [53]

  • The pose network architecture from [53] without the explainability mask did not improve results.

    “We use the architecture proposed by [53] without the explainability mask, which we found not to improve results.”

    From 3D Packing for Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2020) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C., Buenaposada, J. M., Zhu, R., & Lucey, S.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
2022-2030
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963654727
Cited by
667
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 17
FWCI
25.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
monocular depth estimation, unsupervised learning, monocular video, photometric errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review