Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,527

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generative Image Inpainting with Contextual Attention

Open access
Yu, Jiahui, Lin, Zhe, Yang, Jimei, Shen, Xiaohui, Lu, Xin, Huang, Thomas S.·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
DOI 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00577
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent deep learning based approaches have shown promising results for the challenging task of inpainting large missing regions in an image. These methods can generate visually plausible image structures and textures, but often create distorted structures or blurry textures inconsistent with surrounding areas. This is mainly due to ineffectiveness of convolutional neural networks in explicitly borrowing or copying information from distant spatial locations. On the other hand, traditional texture and patch synthesis approaches are particularly suitable when it needs to borrow textures from the surrounding regions. Motivated by these observations, we propose a new deep generative model-based approach which can not only synthesize novel image structures but also explicitly utilize surrounding image features as references during network training to make better predictions. The model is a feedforward, fully convolutional neural network which can process images with multiple holes at arbitrary locations and with variable sizes during the test time. Experiments on multiple datasets including faces (CelebA, CelebA-HQ), textures (DTD) and natural images (ImageNet, Places2) demonstrate that our proposed approach generates higher-quality inpainting results than existing ones. Code, demo and models are available at: https://github.com/JiahuiYu/generative_inpainting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00577

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. yeh, 2016, Semantic image inpainting with perceptual and contextual losses
  2. yang, 2016, High-resolution image inpainting using multi-scale neural patch synthesis
  3. russakovsky, 2015, Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge International Journal of Computer Vision, 115, 211
  4. xu, 2014, Deep convolutional neural network for image deconvolution In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1790
  5. snelgrove, 2017, High-resolution multi-scale neural texture synthesis In SIGGRAPH ASIA 2017 Technical Briefs
  6. simakov, 2008, Summarizing visual data using bidirectional similarity In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2008 CVPR 2008 IEEE Conference, 1
  7. efros, 1999, Texture synthesis by nonparametric sampling In Computer Vision 1999 The Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference, 2, 1033
  8. goodfellow, 2014, Generative adversarial nets In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2672
  9. hays, 2007, Scene completion using millions of photographs In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) ACM
  10. iizuka, 2017, Globally and locally consistent image completion ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 36
  11. jaderberg, 2015, Spatial transformer networks In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017
  12. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.200 · DOI · Paper page
  13. johnson, 2016, Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution In European Conference on Computer Vision, 694
  14. newson, 2014, Video inpainting of complex scenes SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 7, 1993, 10.1137/140954933 · DOI · Paper page
  15. bertalmio, 2000, Image inpainting In Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 417
  16. mao, 2016, Least squares generative adversarial networks
  17. barnes, 2009, Patchmatch A randomized correspondence algorithm for structural image editing ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)(Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2009)
  18. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.82 · DOI · Paper page
  19. chen, 2016, Fast patch-based style transfer of arbitrary style
  20. ballester, 2001, Filling-in by joint interpolation of vector fields and gray levels IEEE transactions on image processing, 10, 1200
  21. efros, 2001, Image quilting for texture synthesis and transfer In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 341
  22. arjovsky, 2017, Wasserstein GAN
  23. karras, 2017, Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality stability and variation
  24. lee, 2015, Deeply- supervised nets In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 562
  25. 10.1007/978-3-319-11752-2_43 · DOI
  26. zhou, 2016, View synthesis by appearance flow In European Conference on Computer Vision, 286
  27. li, 2016, Combining markov random fields and convolutional neural networks for image synthesis In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2479
  28. zhou, 2017, Places A 10 million image database for scene recognition IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli-gence
  29. levin, 2004, Seamless image stitching in the gradient domain Computer Vision-ECCV 2004, 377, 10.1007/978-3-540-24673-2_31 · DOI · Paper page
  30. liu, 2015, Deep learning face attributes in the wild In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  31. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.624 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Yu, J., Lin, Z., Yang, J., Shen, X., Lu, X., & Huang, T. S.
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
5505-5514
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/cvpr.2018.00577
OpenAlex
W3043547428
Cited by
2,527
References
11
FWCI
87.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.