Cited by 775Advanced Vision and ImagingRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Unsupervised Learning of Depth and Ego-Motion from Monocular Video Using 3D Geometric Constraints

Open access
Mahjourian, Reza, Wicke, Martin, Angelova, Anelia·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

We present a novel approach for unsupervised learning of depth and ego-motion from monocular video. Unsupervised learning removes the need for separate supervisory signals (depth or ego-motion ground truth, or multi-view video). Prior work in unsupervised depth learning uses pixel-wise or gradient-based losses, which only consider pixels in small local neighborhoods. Our main contribution is to explicitly consider the inferred 3D geometry of the whole scene, and enforce consistency of the estimated 3D point clouds and ego-motion across consecutive frames. This is a challenging task and is solved by a novel (approximate) backpropagation algorithm for aligning 3D structures. We combine this novel 3D-based loss with 2D losses based on photometric quality of frame reconstructions using estimated depth and ego-motion from adjacent frames. We also incorporate validity masks to avoid penalizing areas in which no useful information exists. We test our algorithm on the KITTI dataset and on a video dataset captured on an uncalibrated mobile phone camera. Our proposed approach consistently improves depth estimates on both datasets, and outperforms the state-of-the-art for both depth and ego-motion. Because we only require a simple video, learning depth and ego-motion on large and varied datasets becomes possible. We demonstrate this by training on the low quality uncalibrated video dataset and evaluating on KITTI, ranking among top performing prior methods which are trained on KITTI itself.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00594

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ImageNet pretraining improves accuracy for the compact model compared to training from scratch.

    “Similar to [30,16], we start with weights pretrained on Ima-geNet [54], and show that this improves accuracy for our compact model compared to training from scratch (Table 2).”

    From Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2019) · cites this paper as [54]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Y. Cao, Z. Wu, , and C. Shen. Estimating depth from monoc- ular images as classification using deep fully convolutional residual networks. CoRR:1605.02305, 2016. 2
  2. J. Flynn, I. Neulander, J. Philbin, and N. Snavely. Deep- stereo: Learning to predict new views from the worlds im- agery. In CVPR, 2016. 2
  3. M. Jaderberg, K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, et al. Spatial transformer networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2017-2025, 2015. 3
  4. J. Xie, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi. Deep3d: Fully au- tomatic 2d-to-3d video conversion with deep convolutional neural networks. ECCV, 2016. 2
  5. J. Zbontar and Y. LeCun. Stereo matching by training a con- volutional neural network to compare image patches. JMLR, 2016. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahjourian, R., Wicke, M., & Angelova, A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
5667-5675
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2785512290
Cited by
775
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 24
FWCI
34.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
unsupervised depth estimation, camera motion estimation, monocular video, KITTI dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review