Cited by 71Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

A Cross-Season Correspondence Dataset for Robust Semantic Segmentation

Open access
Mans Larsson, Mans, Stenborg, Erik, Hammarstrand, Lars, Pollefeys, Marc, Sattler, Torsten, Kahl, Fredrik·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a method to utilize 2D-2D point matches between images taken during different image conditions to train a convolutional neural network for semantic segmentation. Enforcing label consistency across the matches makes the final segmentation algorithm robust to seasonal changes. We describe how these 2D-2D matches can be generated with little human interaction by geometrically matching points from 3D models built from images. Two cross-season correspondence datasets are created providing 2D-2D matches across seasonal changes as well as from day to night. The datasets are made publicly available to facilitate further research. We show that adding the correspondences as extra supervision during training improves the segmentation performance of the convolutional neural network, making it more robust to seasonal changes and weather conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00976

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. H. Badino, D. Huber, and T. Kanade. Visual topometric lo- calization. In Proc. IV, 2011. 3, 9
  2. A. Bearman, O. Russakovsky, V. Ferrari, and L. Fei-Fei. Whats the point: Semantic segmentation with point super- vision. In Proc. ECCV. Springer, 2016. 2
  3. A. Paszke, S. Gross, S. Chintala, G. Chanan, E. Yang, Z. De- Vito, Z. Lin, A. Desmaison, L. Antiga, and A. Lerer. Au- tomatic differentiation in pytorch. In NIPS Workshop, 2017. 5
  4. D. Pathak, P. Krahenbuhl, and T. Darrell. Constrained con- volutional neural networks for weakly supervised segmenta- tion. In Proc. ICCV, 2015. 2
  5. M. Wulfmeier, A. Bewley, and I. Posner. Incremental adver- sarial domain adaptation for continually changing environ- ments. In Proc. ICRA. IEEE, 2018. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mans Larsson, M., Stenborg, E., Hammarstrand, L., Pollefeys, M., Sattler, T., & Kahl, F.
Affiliations
  • Chalmers
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
9524-9534
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921320302
Cited by
71
References
82
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2016-04445)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
semantic segmentation, weather robustness, 3D model reconstruction, label consistency, dataset construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review