Cited by 105Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Vision and ImagingSimulation and Modeling Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SceneGen: Learning to Generate Realistic Traffic Scenes

Open access
Tan, Shuhan, Wong, Kelvin, Wang, Shenlong, Manivasagam, Sivabalan, Ren, Mengye, Urtasun, Raquel·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

We consider the problem of generating realistic traffic scenes automatically. Existing methods typically insert actors into the scene according to a set of hand-crafted heuristics and are limited in their ability to model the true complexity and diversity of real traffic scenes, thus inducing a content gap between synthesized traffic scenes versus real ones. As a result, existing simulators lack the fidelity necessary to train and test self-driving vehicles. To address this limitation, we present SceneGen—a neural autoregressive model of traffic scenes that eschews the need for rules and heuristics. In particular, given the ego-vehicle state and a high definition map of surrounding area, SceneGen inserts actors of various classes into the scene and synthesizes their sizes, orientations, and velocities. We demonstrate on two large-scale datasets SceneGen’s ability to faithfully model distributions of real traffic scenes. Moreover, we show that SceneGen coupled with sensor simulation can be used to train perception models that generalize to the real world.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00095

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. gerlough, 1955, Simulation of Freeway Traffic on a General-Purpose Discrete Variable Computer
  2. uria, 2013, NADE: the real-valued neural autoregressive density-estimator, CoRR
  3. taheri, 1990, An investigation and design of slip control braking systems integrated with four wheel steering

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
Tan, S., Wong, K., Wang, S., Manivasagam, S., Ren, M., & Urtasun, R.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
892-901
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173280621
Cited by
104
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
FWCI
14.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
Keywords
autonomous driving simulation, high-definition maps, sensor simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review