Cited by 25Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningRetinal Imaging and Analysis

vesselFM: A Foundation Model for Universal 3D Blood Vessel Segmentation

Open access
Wittmann, Bastian, Wattenberg, Yannick, Amiranashvili, Tamaz, Shit, Suprosanna, Menze, Bjoern·2025·2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Segmenting 3D blood vessels is a critical yet challenging task in medical image analysis. This is due to significant imaging modality-specific variations in artifacts, vascular patterns and scales, signal-to-noise ratios, and background tissues. These variations, along with domain gaps arising from varying imaging protocols, limit the generalization of existing supervised learning-based methods, requiring tedious voxel-level annotations for each dataset separately. While foundation models promise to alleviate this limitation, they typically fail to generalize to the task of blood vessel segmentation, posing a unique, complex problem. In this work, we present vesselFM, a foundation model designed specifically for the broad task of 3D blood vessel segmentation. Unlike previous models, vesselFM can effortlessly generalize to unseen domains. To achieve zero-shot generalization, we train vesselFM on three heterogeneous data sources: a large, curated annotated dataset, data generated by a domain randomization scheme, and data sampled from a flow matching-based generative model. Extensive evaluations show that vesselFM outperforms state-of-the-art medical image segmentation foundation models across four (pre-)clinically relevant imaging modalities in zero-, one-, and few-shot scenarios, therefore providing a universal solution for 3D blood vessel segmentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.01944

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We developed the Nerve-Module of MouseMapper for nerve segmentation by fine-tuning a pretrained foundation model, VesselFM, using our curated dataset.

    “We developed the Nerve-Module of MouseMapper for nerve segmentation by fine-tuning a pretrained foundation model, VesselFM14, using our curated dataset (described above).”
  • VesselFM was pretrained on a large-scale 3D vessel dataset and was originally designed for 3D blood vessel segmentation.

    “VesselFM was pretrained on a large-scale 3D vessel dataset and was originally designed for the broad task of 3D blood vessel segmentation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wittmann, B., Wattenberg, Y., Amiranashvili, T., Shit, S., & Menze, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2025-06-10
Pages
20874-20884
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413146896
Cited by
25
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 2
FWCI
18.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
foundation models, zero-shot generalization, domain randomization, domain gap, medical image segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review