Practical Key Recovery Model for Self-Sovereign Identity Based Digital Wallets
Abstract
Recent years have seen an increased interest in digital wallets for a multitude of use cases including online banking, cryptocurrency, and digital identity management. Digital wallets play a pivotal role in the secure management of cryptographic keys and credentials, and for providing certain identity management services. In this paper, we examine a proof-of-concept digital wallet in the context of Self-Sovereign Identity and provide a practical decentralized key recovery solution using Shamir's secret sharing scheme and Hyperledger Indy distributed ledger technology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some solutions rely on gateways that can introduce centralization to a certain extent.
“Some solutions rely on gateways that can introduce centralization to a certain extent [46][47]”
From Decentralized and Self-Sovereign Identity: Systematic Mapping Study (2021) · cites this paper as [46]
The SSI architecture can take advantage of Threshold Secret Sharing protocol to offer secure and privacy-respecting backup and recovery of user's sensitive data, including secret keys.
“The SSI architecture can take advantage of Threshold Secret Sharing protocol to offer secure and privacy-respecting backup and recovery of user's sensitive data, including secret keys [122].”
From A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem (2021) · cites this paper as [122]
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756 · see citing works
Goldreich, O., Micali, S., & Wigderson, A. (1987) · Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM conference on Theory of computing - STOC '87 · doi:10.1145/28395.28420 · Cited by 3,590 · see citing works
Safeguarding cryptographic keys
BLAKLEY, G. R. (1979) · 1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK) · doi:10.1109/mark.1979.8817296 · Cited by 3,499 · see citing works
Protocols for secure computations
Yao, A. C. (1982) · 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1982) · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1982.38 · Cited by 3,306 · see citing works
Protocols for secure computations
Yao, A. C.-C. (1982) · 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1982) · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1982.88 · Cited by 2,693 · see citing works
Tools for privacy preserving distributed data mining
Clifton, C., Kantarcioglu, M., Vaidya, J., Lin, X., & Zhu, M. Y. (2002) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/772862.772867 · Cited by 890 · see citing works
Cryptographic techniques for privacy-preserving data mining
Benny Pinkas, B. (2002) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/772862.772865 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
How to share a function securely
Santis, A. D., Desmedt, Y., Frankel, Y., & Yung, M. M. (1994) · ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) · doi:10.1145/195058.195405 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Secure Multiparty Computation for Privacy Preserving Data Mining
Lindell, Y. (2005) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-557-3.ch189 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Trusted execution environments on mobile devices
Ekberg, J.-E., Kostiainen, K., & Asokan, N. (2013) · doi:10.1145/2508859.2516758 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Privacy Preserving k Secure Sum ProtocolPreprint
Sheikh, R., Kumar, B., & Mishra, D. K. (2009) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0912.0956 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
TRIMS, a privacy-aware trust and reputation model for identity management systems
Mármol, F. G., Girão, J., & Pérez, G. M. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.07.020 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Audit and backup procedures for hardware security modules
de Souza, T. C. S., Martina, J. E., & Custódio, R. F. (2008) · doi:10.1145/1373290.1373302 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
An efficient method for privacy preserving data mining in secure multiparty computation
Pathak, F. A. N., & Pandey, S. B. S. (2013) · 2013 Nirma University International Conference on Engineering (NUiCONE) · doi:10.1109/nuicone.2013.6780075 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Nair, D. G., Binu, V. P., & Kumar, G. S. (2014) · 2014 International Conference on Data Science & Engineering (ICDSE) · doi:10.1109/icdse.2014.6974639 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
A key escrow scheme to IOT based on Shamir
Yingli, Z., & Liu, D. (2013) · International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/icccas.2013.6765293 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Matching key recovery mechanisms to business requirements
Rantos, K., & Mitchell, C. J. (2004) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2004.08.010 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A Proposal of Key Recovery Mechanism for Personal Decryptographic Keys
Sun, W., & Harayama, M. (2011) · International Conference on Internet Technology and Applications · doi:10.1109/itap.2011.6006112 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem
Soltani, R., Nguyen, U. T., & An, A. (2021) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1155/2021/8873429 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“(e SSI architecture can take advantage of (reshold Secret Sharing protocol to offer secure and privacy-respecting backup and recovery of user’s sensitive data, including secret keys [122].”
BackgroundSelf-citationDecentralized and Self-Sovereign Identity: Systematic Mapping Study
Cucko, S., & Turkanovic, M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3117588 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“Hence, the ecosystem consists of various entities that enact roles formerly performed by a central authority [9].”
Background
- Authors
- Soltani, R., Nguyen, U. T., & An, A.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-08
- Pages
- 320-325
- OpenAlex
- W2982517141
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Keywords
- self-sovereign identity, digital wallets, key recovery, Shamir secret sharing, Hyperledger Indy, decentralized identity, key management, credential management, distributed ledger technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review