Cited by 22Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFace recognition and analysis

Fetal facial standard plane recognition via very deep convolutional networks

Yu, Zhen, Ni, Dong, Chen, Siping, Li, Shengli, Wang, Tianfu, Lei, Baiying·2016·2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)

Abstract

The accurate recognition of fetal facial standard plane (FFSP) (i.e., axial, coronal and sagittal plane) from ultrasound (US) images is quite essential for routine US examination. Since the labor-intensive and subjective measurement is too time-consuming and unreliable, the development of the automatic FFSP recognition method is highly desirable. Different from the previous methods, we leverage a general framework to recognize the FFSP from US images automatically. Specifically, instead of using the previous hand-crafted visual features, we utilize the recent developed deep learning approach via very deep convolutional networks (DCNN) architecture to represent fine-grained details of US image. Also, very small (3×3) convolution filters are adopted to improve the performance. The evaluation of our FFSP dataset shows the superiority of our method over the previous studies and achieves the state-of-the-art FFSP recognition results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/embc.2016.7590780

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four studies evaluated AI assessment of fetal lung ultrasound for assessment of fetal lung maturity, prediction of neonatal respiratory morbidity and assessment of correlation of fetal lung texture with gestational age.

    “Four studies evaluated AI assessment of fetal lung ultrasound for assessment of fetal lung maturity, prediction of neonatal respiratory morbidity and assessment of correlation of fetal lung texture with gestational age.[111][112][113][114]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Z., Ni, D., Chen, S., Li, S., Wang, T., & Lei, B.
Venue
2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-08
Volume
2016
Pages
627-630
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2533041079
Cited by
22
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound
MeSH terms
Face, Fetus, Humans, Learning, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review