An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and professional behavior
Abstract
A number of recent studies have found correlations between academic dishonesty in higher education and unethical behavior in the work settings. However, these studies have not explored the causal relationship between the underlying factors that lead to this dishonesty. This realization, and apparently high levels of cheating among engineering students, has lead us to a research hypothesis that decision making patterns about academic cheating among engineering students are positively correlated with those individuals' decision making patterns about work place ethics and responsibility. To test our hypothesis, we have developed an exploratory survey that asks questions about the respondent's decisions during opportunities to "cheat" in each of two contexts: college classrooms and work-place settings (with a special focus on engineering work settings). The survey was designed to provide qualitative data that could be used to later develop a more robust quantitative survey. This paper will present only the preliminary quantitative results from this survey.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Academic misconduct in school is highly correlated to dishonesty and with similar decision-making patterns in the workplace.
“studies have demonstrated that academic misconduct in school is highly correlated to dishonesty and with similar decision-making patterns in the workplace39,40”
From Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Techniques of attitude scale construction.
Edwards, A. L. (1957) · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks · doi:10.1037/14423-000 · Cited by 1,670 · see citing works
Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior
Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-h · Cited by 1,325 · see citing works
Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1024954224675 · Cited by 830 · see citing works
McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315263465-43 · Cited by 730 · see citing works
Mackay, I. R. (1995) · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences
McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1993) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/2959991 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832320109599052 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Cheating by Economics Students: A Comparison of Survey Results
Kerkvliet, J. (1994) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220485.1994.10844821 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors
McCabe, D. L. (1997) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-997-0046-y · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Relation of General Deviance to Academic Dishonesty
Blankenship, K. L., & Whitley, B. E. (2000) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1001_1 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Sheard, J., Dick, M., Markham, S., MacDonald, I. F., & Walsh, M. (2002) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/544414.544468 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Social desirability and the randomized response technique.
Himmelfarb, S., & Lickteig, C. W. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.710 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Involvement of nursing students in unethical classroom and clinical behaviors
Hilbert, G. A. (1985) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/s8755-7223(85)80160-5 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Academic Integrity and Social Structure: A Study of Cheating among College Students
Harp, J. A., & Taietz, P. (1966) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/798585 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Sheard, J., Dick, M., Markham, S., MacDonald, I. F., & Walsh, M. (2002) · ACM SIGCSE Bulletin · doi:10.1145/637610.544468 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
The Relationship between Student Cheating and College Fraternity or Sorority Membership
McCabe, D. L., & Bowers, W. J. (2009) · NASPA Journal · doi:10.2202/1949-6605.5032 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Cheating by Economics Students: A Comparison of Survey Results
Kerkvliet, J. (1994) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.2307/1183278 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Academic Integrity and Social Structure: A Study of Cheating among College Students
Harp, J. A., & Taietz, P. (1966) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1966.13.4.03a00010 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Social desirability and the randomized response technique.
Himmelfarb, S., & Lickteig, C. W. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.43.4.710 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
FACTORS INFLUENCING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ DECISIONS TO CHEAT BY TYPE OF ASSESSMENT
Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2006) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9010-y · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationIbrahim, H., Liu, F., Asim, R., Battu, B., Benabderrahmane, S., Alhafni, B., Adnan, W., Alhanai, T., AlShebli, B., Baghdadi, R., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-38964-3 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harding, T. S., Passow, H. J., Carpenter, D. D., & Finelli, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Kettering University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Lawrence Technological University (US)
- ORCID
- Finelli, C.J.
- Venue
- 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003.
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-07-08
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- S2A_6-S2A_11
- ISSN
- 0190-5848 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142909884
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- academic dishonesty, cheating, professional ethics, workplace ethics, engineering students, decision-making, unethical behavior, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review