Cited by 20Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationEngineering Education and Curriculum Development

An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and professional behavior

Harding, T.S., Passow, H.J., Carpenter, D.D., Finelli, C.J.·2004·33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003.

Abstract

A number of recent studies have found correlations between academic dishonesty in higher education and unethical behavior in the work settings. However, these studies have not explored the causal relationship between the underlying factors that lead to this dishonesty. This realization, and apparently high levels of cheating among engineering students, has lead us to a research hypothesis that decision making patterns about academic cheating among engineering students are positively correlated with those individuals' decision making patterns about work place ethics and responsibility. To test our hypothesis, we have developed an exploratory survey that asks questions about the respondent's decisions during opportunities to "cheat" in each of two contexts: college classrooms and work-place settings (with a special focus on engineering work settings). The survey was designed to provide qualitative data that could be used to later develop a more robust quantitative survey. This paper will present only the preliminary quantitative results from this survey.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/fie.2003.1265933

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harding, T. S., Passow, H. J., Carpenter, D. D., & Finelli, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Kettering University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Lawrence Technological University (US)
Venue
33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003.
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2004-07-08
Volume
3
Pages
S2A_6-S2A_11
ISSN
0190-5848 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142909884
Cited by
20
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
academic dishonesty, cheating, professional ethics, workplace ethics, engineering students, decision-making, unethical behavior, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review