Cited by 133Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningDigital Media Forensic Detection

GAN Enhanced Membership Inference: A Passive Local Attack in Federated Learning

Zhang, Jingwen, Zhang, Jiale, Chen, Junjun, Yu, Shui·2020·ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)

Abstract

Federated learning has lately received great attention for its privacy protection feature. However, recent researches found that federated learning models are susceptible to various inference attacks. In this paper, we point out a membership inference attack method that can cause a serious privacy leakage in federated learning. An adversary who is a participant in federated learning can train a classification attack model to launch the membership inference attack, which determines if a data record is in the model's training dataset. The existing membership inference method is dissatisfied due to a lack of attack data since the training data of each participant are independent. To overcome the lack of attack data, an adversary can enrich attack data using the generative adversarial network (GAN), which is a practical method to increase data diversity. We substantiate that this GAN enhanced membership inference attack method has a 98% attack accuracy. We perform experiments to show that data diversity and the overfitting make federated learning models susceptible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icc40277.2020.9148790

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fake parameter update from an adversary is a security bottleneck [81] which can impersonate a certain client and broadcast fake parameters.

    “The fake parameter update from an adversary is also a security bottleneck [81] which can impersonate a certain client and broadcast fake parameters.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Chen, J., & Yu, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
Venue
ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1550-3607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045720734
Cited by
133
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 9
FWCI
5.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Communications (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
membership inference attacks, federated learning, generative adversarial networks, privacy leakage, data diversity, overfitting, federated learning security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review