The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bottom-up saliency is a discriminant process
Abstract
A bottom-up visual saliency detector is proposed, following a decision-theoretic formulation of saliency, previously developed for top-down processing (object recognition) [5]. The saliency of a given location of the visual field is defined as the power of a Gabor-like feature set to discriminate between the visual appearance of 1) a neighborhood centered at that location (the center) and 2) a neighborhood that surrounds it (the surround). Discrimination is defined in an information-theoretic sense and the optimal saliency detector derived for a class of stimuli that complies with known statistical properties of natural images, so as to achieve a computationally efficient solution. The resulting saliency detector is shown to replicate the fundamental properties of the psychophysics of pre-attentive vision, including stimulus pop-out, inability to detect feature conjunctions, asymmetries with respect to feature presence vs. absence, and compliance with Weber's law. It is also shown that the detector produces better predictions of human eye fixations than two previously proposed bottom-up saliency detectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Combined Corner and Edge Detector
Harris, C., & Stephens, M. (1988) · Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988 · doi:10.5244/c.2.23 · Cited by 12,901
Scale & Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000027790.02288.f2 · Cited by 3,436
Yarbus, A. L. (1967) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7 · Cited by 3,304
Stochastic completion fields: A neural model of illusory contour shape and salience.
Williams, L. R., & Jacobs, D. W. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.4.837 · Cited by 331
Cited by
SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics
Zhang, L., Tong, M. H., Marks, T. K., Shan, H., & Cottrell, G. W. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.7.32 · Cited by 1,227
Salient Object Detection: A Discriminative Regional Feature Integration Approach
Jiang, H., Wang, J., Yuan, Z., Wu, Y., Zheng, N., & Li, S. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.271 · Cited by 1,147
Large-Scale Optimization of Hierarchical Features for Saliency Prediction in Natural Images
Vig, E., Dorr, M., & Cox, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.358 · Cited by 428
Saliency detection using maximum symmetric surround
Achanta, R., & Susstrunk, S. (2010) · 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2010.5652636 · Cited by 384
Saliency estimation using a non-parametric low-level vision model
Murray, N., Vanrell, M., Otazu, X., & Parraga, C. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995506 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, D., & Vasconcelos, N.
- Venue
- 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2164716063
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bottom-up saliency is a discriminant process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2007.4408851
- The paper
- Gao, D., & Vasconcelos, N. (2007). Bottom-up saliency is a discriminant process. 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2007.4408851
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.