Cited by 4,487Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

VQA: Visual Question Answering

Antol, Stanislaw, Agrawal, Aishwarya, Lu, Jiasen, Mitchell, Margaret, Batra, Dhruv, Zitnick, C. Lawrence, Parikh, Devi·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

We propose the task of free-form and open-ended Visual Question Answering (VQA). Given an image and a natural language question about the image, the task is to provide an accurate natural language answer. Mirroring real-world scenarios, such as helping the visually impaired, both the questions and answers are open-ended. Visual questions selectively target different areas of an image, including background details and underlying context. As a result, a system that succeeds at VQA typically needs a more detailed understanding of the image and complex reasoning than a system producing generic image captions. Moreover, VQA is amenable to automatic evaluation, since many open-ended answers contain only a few words or a closed set of answers that can be provided in a multiple-choice format. We provide a dataset containing ~0.25M images, ~0.76M questions, and ~10M answers (www.visualqa.org), and discuss the information it provides. Numerous baselines for VQA are provided and compared with human performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2015.279

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 65 references

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. lin, 2015, Don't just listen, use your imagination: Leveraging visual common sense for non-visual tasks, CVPR
  2. lenat, 1989, Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems Representation and Inference in the CYC Project

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,027

Metadata

Authors
Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Zitnick, C. L., & Parikh, D.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-12
Pages
2425-2433
OpenAlex
W1933349210
Cited by
4,487
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 260 · 2025: 519 · 2024: 532 · 2023: 560 · 2022: 518 · 2021: 620 · 2020: 485 · 2019: 432 · 2018: 293 · 2017: 183 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 9
FWCI
76.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
visual question answering, open-ended question answering, image understanding, visual reasoning, assistive technology for visually impaired, automated assessment, image captioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review