Cited by 101Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Decoupling the Role of Data, Attention, and Losses in Multimodal Transformers

Open access
Hendricks, Lisa Anne, Mellor, John, Schneider, Rosalia, Alayrac, Jean-Baptiste, Nematzadeh, Aida·2021·Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

Recently, multimodal transformer models have gained popularity because their performance on downstream tasks suggests they learn rich visual-linguistic representations. Focusing on zero-shot image retrieval tasks, we study three important factors that can impact the quality of learned representations: pretraining data, the attention mechanism, and loss functions. By pretraining models on six datasets, we observe that dataset noise and language similarity to our downstream task are important indicators of model performance. Through architectural analysis, we learn that models with a multimodal attention mechanism can outperform deeper models with modality-specific attention mechanisms. Finally, we show that successful contrastive losses used in the self-supervised learning literature do not yield similar performance gains when used in multimodal transformers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/tacl_a_00385

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Curating higher-quality image-text datasets may be more important than generating large single-modality datasets, and other aspects of algorithm development and training.

    “A study from DeepMind, in fact, suggested that curating higher-quality image-text datasets may be more important than generating large single-modality datasets, and other aspects of algorithm development and training 119”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [119]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendricks, L. A., Mellor, J., Schneider, R., Alayrac, J.-B., & Nematzadeh, A.
Affiliations
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • DeepMind, United Kingdom. rgschneider@google.com
Corresponding author
  • Hendricks, Lisa Anne
  • Mellor, John
  • Alayrac, Jean-Baptiste
  • Nematzadeh, Aida
Venue
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
570-585
ISSN
2307-387X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3184369217
Cited by
100
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
multimodal transformer, zero-shot image retrieval, pre-training data, language similarity, multimodal attention, modality-specific attention, contrastive loss, self-supervised learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review