Cited by 677Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Objects365: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Dataset for Object Detection

Shao, Shuai, Li, Zeming, Zhang, Tianyuan, Peng, Chao, Yu, Gang, Zhang, Xiangyu, Li, Jing, Sun, Jian·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new large-scale object detection dataset, Objects365, which has 365 object categories over 600K training images. More than 10 million, high-quality bounding boxes are manually labeled through a three-step, carefully designed annotation pipeline. It is the largest object detection dataset (with full annotation) so far and establishes a more challenging benchmark for the community. Objects365 can serve as a better feature learning dataset for localization-sensitive tasks like object detection and semantic segmentation. The Objects365 pre-trained models significantly outperform ImageNet pre-trained models with 5.6 points gain (42 vs 36.4) based on the standard setting of 90K iterations on COCO benchmark. Even compared with much long training time like 540K iterations, our Objects365 pretrained model with 90K iterations still have 2.7 points gain (42 vs 39.3). Meanwhile, the finetuning time can be greatly reduced (up to 10 times) when reaching the same accuracy. Better generalization ability of Object365 has also been verified on CityPersons, VOC segmentation, and ADE tasks. The dataset as well as the pretrained-models have been released at www.objects365.org.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2019.00852

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing large DETR models have demonstrated impressive performance on COCO test-dev leaderboard.

    “Existing large DETR models [3, 6, 32, 41, 44, 46] have demonstrated impressive performance on COCO test-dev [20] leaderboard.”

    From DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

  • DINO achieves the SOTA result with a publicly available SwinL backbone and a public dataset Objects365 (1.7M annotated images) only.

    “In contrast, DINO achieves the SOTA result with a publicly available SwinL [23] backbone and a public dataset Objects365 [33] (1.7M annotated images) only.”

    From DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, S., Li, Z., Zhang, T., Peng, C., Yu, G., Zhang, X., Li, J., & Sun, J.
Affiliations
Megvii (China) (CN)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
8429-8438
OpenAlex
W2983943451
Cited by
673
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2
FWCI
11.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
bounding box annotation, annotation pipeline, pre-trained models, representation learning, semantic segmentation, benchmark, COCO benchmark, CityPersons, ADE20K

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review