PreprintCited by 1,624Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

DSSD : Deconvolutional Single Shot Detector

Open access
Fu, Cheng-Yang, Liu, Wei, Ranga, Ananth, Tyagi, Ambrish, Berg, Alexander C.·2017·arXiv

Abstract

The main contribution of this paper is an approach for introducing additional context into state-of-the-art general object detection. To achieve this we first combine a state-of-the-art classifier (Residual-101[14]) with a fast detection framework (SSD[18]). We then augment SSD+Residual-101 with deconvolution layers to introduce additional large-scale context in object detection and improve accuracy, especially for small objects, calling our resulting system DSSD for deconvolutional single shot detector. While these two contributions are easily described at a high-level, a naive implementation does not succeed. Instead we show that carefully adding additional stages of learned transformations, specifically a module for feed-forward connections in deconvolution and a new output module, enables this new approach and forms a potential way forward for further detection research. Results are shown on both PASCAL VOC and COCO detection. Our DSSD with $513 \times 513$ input achieves 81.5% mAP on VOC2007 test, 80.0% mAP on VOC2012 test, and 33.2% mAP on COCO, outperforming a state-of-the-art method R-FCN[3] on each dataset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1701.06659

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous other single-stage object detection algorithms have been introduced, including SSD, DSSD, RetinaNet, M2Det, and RefineDet++.

    “There are numerous other algorithms that have been introduced in recent past such as Single Shot Detector (SSD) [43], Deconvolution Single Shot Detector (DSSD) [16], RetinaNet [41], M2Det [86], RefineDet++ [85], are based on single stage object detection.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [1][1] S. Bell, C. L. Zitnick, K. Bala, and R. Girshick. Inside-outside net: Detecting objects in context with skip pooling and recurrent neural networks. In CVPR , 2016. 2, 6, 7, 8 -
  2. [2][2] Z. Cai, Q. Fan, R. S. Feris, and N. Vasconcelos. A unified multiscale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection. In ECCV , 2016. 3, 4 -
  3. [3][3] J. Dai, Y. Li, K. He, and J. Sun. R-fcn: Object detection via regionbased fully convolutional networks. In NIPS , 2016. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 -
  4. [4][4] N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR , 2005. 1 -
  5. [5][5] D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, A. Toshev, and D. Anguelov. Scalable object detection using deep neural networks. In CVPR , 2014. 1 -
  6. [6][6] M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. IJCV , 2010. 1 -
  7. [7][7] P. Felzenszwalb, D. McAllester, and D. Ramanan. A discriminatively trained, multiscale, deformable part model. In CVPR , 2008. 1 -
  8. [8][8] A. Fukui, D. H. Park, D. Yang, A. Rohrbach, T. Darrell, and M. Rohrbach. Multimodal compact bilinear pooling for visual question answering and visual grounding. In EMNLP , 2016. 6 -
  9. [9][9] Y. Gao, O. Beijbom, N. Zhang, and T. Darrell. Compact bilinear pooling. In CVPR . 2016. 6 -
  10. [10][10] S. Gidaris and N. Komodakis. Object detection via a multi-region and semantic segmentation-aware cnn model. In ICCV , 2015. 3, 6 -
  11. [11][11] R. Girshick. Fast r-cnn. In ICCV , 2015. 2, 9 -
  12. [12][12] R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In CVPR , 2014. 1, 9 -
  13. [13][13] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. In ECCV , 2014. 2 -
  14. [14][14] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In CVPR , 2016. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 -
  15. [15][15] M. Holschneider, R. Kronland-Martinet, J. Morlet, and P. Tchamitchian. A real-time algorithm for signal analysis with the help of the wavelet transform. In Wavelets , pages 286-297. Springer, 1990. 5 -
  16. [16][16] T. Kong, A. Yao, Y. Chen, and F. Sun. Hypernet: Towards accurate region proposal generation and joint object detection. In CVPR , 2016. 2 -
  17. [17][17] T.-Y. Lin, A. RoyChowdhury, and S. Maji. Bilinear cnns for finegrained visual recognition. In ICCV , 2015. 6 -
  18. [18][18] W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, S. Christian, S. Reed, C.-Y. Fu, and A. C. Berg. SSD: single shot multibox detector. In ECCV , 2016. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 -
  19. [20][20] A. Newell, K. Yang, and J. Deng. Stacked hourglass networks for human pose estimation. In ECCV , 2016. 2, 3, 4 -
  20. [21][21] H. Noh, S. Hong, and B. Han. Learning deconvolution network for semantic segmentation. In ICCV , 2015. 2, 3 -
  21. [22][22] P. O. Pinheiro, T.-Y. Lin, R. Collobert, and P. Dollr. Learning to refine object segments. In ECCV , 2016. 4 -
  22. [23][23] J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In CVPR , 2016. 1, 2 -
  23. [24][24] S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun. Faster R-CNN: Towards realtime object detection with region proposal networks. In NIPS , 2015. 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 -
  24. [25][25] O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh, S. Ma, Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A. Khosla, M. Bernstein, A. C. Berg, and L. Fei-Fei. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. IJCV , 2015. 4, 5 -
  25. [26][26] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In ICLR , 2015. 2, 3 -
  26. [27][27] J. R. Uijlings, K. E. van de Sande, T. Gevers, and A. W. Smeulders. Selective search for object recognition. IJCV , 2013. 1 (a) Dense Cases :DSSD considers context more compared to SSD. This yields better performance on small objects and dense scenes. <!-- image --> (b) Scene Context Cases : DSSD also captures scene context, cleanly handling a wide variety of scenes and geometric configurations. <!-- image --> Figure 4: (a) on previous page. (b) above. Detection examples on COCO test-dev with SSD321/DSSD321 model. For each pair, the left side is the result of SSD and right side is the result of DSSD. We show detections with scores higher than 0.6. Each color corresponds to an object category.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, C.-Y., Liu, W., Ranga, A., Tyagi, A., & Berg, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2579985080
Cited by
1,624
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 203 · 2021: 316 · 2020: 306 · 2019: 320 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 19
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
Single Shot MultiBox Detector, deconvolution, object detection, context modeling, small object detection, ResNet-101, Pascal VOC, COCO

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review