Cited by 522Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsReinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and Learning

Reinforced Cross-Modal Matching and Self-Supervised Imitation Learning for Vision-Language Navigation

Open access
Wang, Xin, Huang, Qiuyuan, Celikyilmaz, Asli, Gao, Jianfeng, Shen, Dinghan, Wang, Yuan-Fang, Wang, William Yang, Zhang, Lei·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Vision-language navigation (VLN) is the task of navigating an embodied agent to carry out natural language instructions inside real 3D environments. In this paper, we study how to address three critical challenges for this task: the cross-modal grounding, the ill-posed feedback, and the generalization problems. First, we propose a novel Reinforced Cross-Modal Matching (RCM) approach that enforces cross-modal grounding both locally and globally via reinforcement learning (RL). Particularly, a matching critic is used to provide an intrinsic reward to encourage global matching between instructions and trajectories, and a reasoning navigator is employed to perform cross-modal grounding in the local visual scene. Evaluation on a VLN benchmark dataset shows that our RCM model significantly outperforms previous methods by 10% on SPL and achieves the new state-of-the-art performance. To improve the generalizability of the learned policy, we further introduce a Self-Supervised Imitation Learning (SIL) method to explore unseen environments by imitating its own past, good decisions. We demonstrate that SIL can approximate a better and more efficient policy, which tremendously minimizes the success rate performance gap between seen and unseen environments (from 30.7% to 11.7%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00679

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On ScanQA, LLaVA-3D and 3D-LLM show strong generalization and excel in question-answering accuracy and spatial reasoning, mainly due to optimized multi-view feature extraction and 3D spatial embedding.

    “Among them, LLaVA-3D [280] and 3D-LLM [282] demonstrate strong generalization capabilities, excelling in question-answering accuracy and spatial reasoning, primarily due to their optimized multi-view feature extraction and 3D spatial embedding mechanisms.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Huang, Q., Celikyilmaz, A., Gao, J., Shen, D., Wang, Y.-F., Wang, W. Y., & Zhang, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Microsoft Research AI
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
6622-6631
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964935470
Cited by
522
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 33
FWCI
23.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Microsoft Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
vision-and-language navigation, cross-modal grounding, reinforcement learning, natural language instructions, embodied agents, generalization to unseen environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review