Cited by 11Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAerospace Engineering and Control Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Visual Detection and Tracking using Deep Neural Networks: A Performance Benchmark

Open access
Isaac-Medina, Brian K. S., Poyser, Matt, Organisciak, Daniel, Willcocks, Chris G., Breckon, Toby P., Shum, Hubert P. H.·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) can pose a major risk for aviation safety, due to both negligent and malicious use. For this reason, the automated detection and tracking of UAV is a fundamental task in aerial security systems. Common technologies for UAV detection include visible-band and thermal infrared imaging, radio frequency and radar. Recent advances in deep neural networks (DNNs) for image-based object detection open the possibility to use visual information for this detection and tracking task. Furthermore, these detection architectures can be implemented as backbones for visual tracking systems, thereby enabling persistent tracking of UAV incursions. To date, no comprehensive performance benchmark exists that applies DNNs to visible-band imagery for UAV detection and tracking. To this end, three datasets with varied environmental conditions for UAV detection and tracking, comprising a total of 241 videos (331,486 images), are assessed using four detection architectures and three tracking frameworks. The best performing detector architecture obtains an mAP of 98.6% and the best performing tracking framework obtains a MOTA of 98.7%. Cross-modality evaluation is carried out between visible and infrared spectrums, achieving a maximal 82.8% mAP on visible images when training in the infrared modality. These results provide the first public multi-approach benchmark for state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods and give insight into which detection and tracking architectures are effective in the UAV domain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccvw54120.2021.00142

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Counter-drone technology is widely under study, which for example enables configuration of guarded areas to either permit or block drones.

    “To prevent those misuses as in [150-154], counter-drone technology is widely under study, which for example, enables the configuration of guarded areas to either permit or block drones.”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [153]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.347 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Isaac-Medina, B. K. S., Poyser, M., Organisciak, D., Willcocks, C. G., Breckon, T. P., & Shum, H. P. H.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
1223-1232
ISSN
2473-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3138033608
Cited by
9
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Keywords
unmanned aerial vehicle detection, UAV tracking, deep neural network, object detection, visual object tracking, benchmark, MOTA, maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review