The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A modified particle swarm optimizer
Abstract
Evolutionary computation techniques, genetic algorithms, evolutionary strategies and genetic programming are motivated by the evolution of nature. A population of individuals, which encode the problem solutions are manipulated according to the rule of survival of the fittest through "genetic" operations, such as mutation, crossover and reproduction. A best solution is evolved through the generations. In contrast to evolutionary computation techniques, Eberhart and Kennedy developed a different algorithm through simulating social behavior (R.C. Eberhart et al., 1996; R.C. Eberhart and J. Kennedy, 1996; J. Kennedy and R.C. Eberhart, 1995; J. Kennedy, 1997). As in other algorithms, a population of individuals exists. This algorithm is called particle swarm optimization (PSO) since it resembles a school of flying birds. In a particle swarm optimizer, instead of using genetic operators, these individuals are "evolved" by cooperation and competition among the individuals themselves through generations. Each particle adjusts its flying according to its own flying experience and its companions' flying experience. We introduce a new parameter, called inertia weight, into the original particle swarm optimizer. Simulations have been done to illustrate the significant and effective impact of this new parameter on the particle swarm optimizer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new optimizer using particle swarm theory
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (2002) · MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science · doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 · Cited by 16,067
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- fogel, 1994, Computational Intelligence Imitating Life
- shi, 1997, Design of Evolutionary Fuzzy Expert system, Proc of 1997 Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering Conference
- 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 · DOI · Paper page
- goldberg, 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning
- koza, 1992, Genetic Programming On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection
- 10.1109/ICEC.1997.592326 · DOI
- eberhart, 1996, Computational Intelligence PC Tools
- rechenberg, 1994, Computational Intelligence Imitating Life
- 1991, Handbook of Genetic Algorithms
Cited by
Particle swarm optimization algorithm: An overview
Wang, D., Tan, D., & Liu, L. (2018) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-016-2474-6 · Cited by 3,343
Particle Swarm Optimization: A Comprehensive Survey
Shami, T. M., El-Saleh, A. A., Alswaitti, M., Al-Tashi, Q., Summakieh, M. A., & Mirjalili, S. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3142859 · Cited by 1,584
Particle swarm optimization for feature selection in classification: a multi-objective approach
Xue, B., Zhang, M., & Browne, W. N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2227469 · Cited by 1,282
A Competitive Swarm Optimizer for Large Scale Optimization
Cheng, R., & Jin, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2014.2322602 · Cited by 1,052
A social learning particle swarm optimization algorithm for scalable optimization
Cheng, R., & Jin, Y. (2015) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.039 · Cited by 747
Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science
Tom, G., Schmid, S. P., Baird, S. G., Cao, Y., Darvish, K., Hao, H., Lo, S., Pablo-García, S., Rajaonson, E. M., Skreta, M., et al. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055 · Cited by 707
A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits
Benedetti, M., Garcia-Pintos, D., Perdomo, O., Leyton-Ortega, V., Nam, Y., & Perdomo-Ortiz, A. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0157-8 · Cited by 379
Phoenics: A Bayesian Optimizer for Chemistry
Häse, F., Roch, L. M., Kreisbeck, C., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.8b00307 · Cited by 379
Sun, Y., Wang, S., Xiao, F., & Gao, D. (2013) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2013.03.026 · Cited by 358
An improved particle swarm optimization for feature selection
Liu, Y., Wang, G., Chen, H., Dong, H., Zhu, X., & Wang, S. (2011) · Journal of Bionic Engineering · doi:10.1016/s1672-6529(11)60020-6 · Cited by 324
Metaheuristic Algorithms in Modeling and Optimization
Gandomi, A. H., Yang, X.-S., Talatahari, S., & Alavi, A. H. (2013) · Metaheuristic Applications in Structures and Infrastructures · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-398364-0.00001-2 · Cited by 268
Long, B., Xian, W., Jiang, L., & Liu, Z. (2013) · Microelectronics Reliability · doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2013.01.006 · Cited by 244
Wang, L., Wang, Z., & Yang, R. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2011.2178044 · Cited by 235
Position control of nonlinear hydraulic system using an improved PSO based PID controller
Ye, Y., Yin, C.-B., Gong, Y., & Zhou, J.-J. (2017) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.010 · Cited by 199
Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Automated Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
Raghavendra, U., Acharya, U. R., & Adeli, H. (2019) · European Neurology · doi:10.1159/000504292 · Cited by 174
Automatic Annotation of Hip Anatomy in Fluoroscopy for Robust and Efficient 2D/3D Registration
Grupp, R. B., Unberath, M., Gao, C., Hegeman, R. A., Murphy, R. J., Alexander, C. P., Otake, Y., McArthur, B. A., Armand, M., & Taylor, R. H. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-020-02162-7 · Cited by 83
“An attempt is first made to register the pelvis using a mixture of the Differential Evolution [23], exhaustive grid search, Particle Swarm [24], Covariance Matrix Adaptation: Evolutionary Search (CMA-ES) [25], and Bounded Optimization by Quadratic Approximation (BOBYQA) [26] optimization strategies at multiple resolut…”
MethodLakshmi, S., & Ganguly, S. (2018) · IET Renewable Power Generation · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5389 · Cited by 53
Allocating Power and Bandwidth in Multibeam Satellite Systems using Particle Swarm Optimization
Pachler, N., Luis, J. J. G., Guerster, M., Crawley, E., & Cameron, B. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference · doi:10.1109/aero47225.2020.9172694 · Cited by 51
Hybrid Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm and Particle Swarm Search for Global Optimization
Chun-Feng, W., Kui, L., & Pei-Ping, S. (2014) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2014/832949 · Cited by 38
Bibliometric Literature Review of Adaptive Learning Systems
Koutsantonis, D., Koutsantonis, K., Bakas, N. P., Plevris, V., Langousis, A., & Chatzichristofis, S. A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141912684 · Cited by 21
Wei, J., Qi, S., Wang, W., Jiang, L., Gao, H., Zhao, F., Al-Bukhaiti, K., & Wan, A. (2025) · Contemporary Mathematics · doi:10.37256/cm.6220256459 · Cited by 15
A nonlinear quality of experience model for high dynamic spatio-temporal mulsemedia
Jalal, L., & Murroni, M. (2017) · 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex.2017.7965654 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, Y., & Eberhart, R.
- Venue
- 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002-11-27
- Pages
- 69-73
- OpenAlex
- W2165299997
- Cited by
- 10,229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 67.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
